From: Giuseppe Battistoni (Giuseppe.Battistoni@mi.infn.it)
Date: Tue Dec 30 2003 - 23:17:26 CET
Date: Tue, 30 Dec 2003 16:33:03 -0500
Subject: particle tagging
To: fluka-discuss@fluka.org
X-Mailer: Lotus Notes Release 5.0.11 July 24, 2002
Message-ID: <OF4FF1204A.72913744-ON85256E0C.0074F8A8-85256E0C.0076623E@notes.duke.edu>
From: Vaclav Vylet <vylet001@mc.duke.edu>
X-MIMETrack: Serialize by Router on strider.notes.duke.edu/DUMC_Services/mc/Duke(Release
6.0.3HF22 | October 10, 2003) at 12/30/2003 16:33:06
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on
troisi.fisica.unimi.it
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.9 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,
FROM_ENDS_IN_NUMS autolearn=no version=2.60
Hi,
I would like to separate a contribution to fluence or energy deposition
from particles having passed through a specific region. I suppose I could
estimate that by having two separate runs and introducing "black hole"
material in appropriate places. However, this approach may be complicated
and error-prone for some geometries. Is there a way to "tag" particles (and
their progeny) that passed through a given region and score their
contribution separately? Perhaps one would write a collision tape and
post-process it with an existing utility? I would appreciate any
suggestions.
Thanks
Vashek Vylet
<vashek.vylet@duke.edu>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Dec 30 2003 - 23:18:17 CET