RE: Request for an increase of the ICOMAX parameter

From: Fan Lei (falei@space.qinetiq.com)
Date: Fri May 20 2005 - 11:23:47 CEST

  • Next message: maestro: "Error message explanation needed"

    Thanks for the positive response.

    >
    > I already increased ICOMAX in this last one, following your message,
    > but I would be surprised we'll be ready to release it before mid-july.

    We certainly would like to start the simulations now, to to wait for two months.

    >
    > If you are in a hurry we can manage
    >
    > a) to make an ad-hoc change in the "old" release just to
    > increase ICOMAX

    This will be my prefered option. Increase ICOMAX to 1000 will satisfy
    our requirement.

    > b) you could help beta-testing the new release (with all potential
    > issues associated)
    >
    I am happy to do this as well but would prefer to use the released
    version for our simulations.

    Regards

    Fan

     

    #############################################################

    The information contained in this email and any subsequent
    correspondence is private and is intended solely for the
    intended recipient(s). For those other than the intended
    recipient(s) any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any
    action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such
    information is prohibited and may be unlawful.

    #############################################################


  • Next message: maestro: "Error message explanation needed"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri May 20 2005 - 11:31:46 CEST