From: Giuseppe Battistoni (Giuseppe.Battistoni@mi.infn.it)
Date: Wed Sep 13 2006 - 21:17:52 CEST
Recently a small bug in usxsuw.f was spotted by a new FLUKA user
(Nicole Patricia Lee Pratt-Boyden). See the mail archive of
Sept 7th.
Ciao
Giuseppe Battistoni
On Wed, 13 Sep 2006, Harine, Katherine wrote:
> Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2006 13:20:42 -0500
> From: "Harine, Katherine" <Katherine.J.Harine@nasa.gov>
> To: fluka-discuss@fluka.org
> Subject: Utilities in FLUKA 2006.3
>
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6D761.526F34AA
> Content-Type: text/plain;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
>
>
> Are all of the files in the utilities directory, flutil, the same with =
> the new version of FLUKA? usysuw.f in both versions appear identical, =
> but usxsuw.f in the new versions has differences that appear to be =
> spaces in several FORTRAN cards with no functional differences and =
> slight differences in FORMAT cards for WRITE statments.
>
> I recall that in a previous release, the common blocks changed. I have =
> this question because I have revised several of the utilities for =
> particular situations.
>
> Thank you,
>
> - Katherine
>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6D761.526F34AA
> Content-Type: text/html;
> charset="iso-8859-1"
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
>
> <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
> <HTML>
> <HEAD>
> <META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
> charset=3Diso-8859-1">
> <META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
> 6.5.7233.69">
> <TITLE>Utilities in FLUKA 2006.3</TITLE>
> </HEAD>
> <BODY>
> <!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
> <BR>
> <BR>
>
> <P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Are all of the files in the utilities directory, =
> flutil, the same with the new version of FLUKA? usysuw.f in both =
> versions appear identical, but usxsuw.f in the new versions has =
> differences that appear to be spaces in several FORTRAN cards with no =
> functional differences and slight differences in FORMAT cards for WRITE =
> statments.<BR>
> <BR>
> I recall that in a previous release, the common blocks changed. I =
> have this question because I have revised several of the utilities for =
> particular situations.<BR>
> <BR>
> Thank you,<BR>
> <BR>
> - Katherine<BR>
> </FONT>
> </P>
>
> </BODY>
> </HTML>
> ------_=_NextPart_001_01C6D761.526F34AA--
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Sep 13 2006 - 21:32:35 CEST