The PEATHRESH option

From: Joseph Comfort (Joseph.Comfort@asu.edu)
Date: Sat Apr 14 2007 - 06:46:19 CEST

  • Next message: M.Chin@surrey.ac.uk: "Re: delayed (n, gamma)"

    I am looking at particle production from 12.9-GeV/c protons incident on a
    Pt target (8 mm diam. by 6 cm long). The Release Notes indicate that the
    card PHYSICS...PEATHRESH is intended to provide better physics, especially
    for thin targets, but is still under development. I have made some
    comparisons with and without the option. Lists of particle productions
    are given below. The number of produced particles with the card is larger,
    for almost every species, that without the card. I do not see a lot of
    difference in, for example, the neutron spectra, but there is some.

    My question is whether the PEATHRESH option is sufficiently reliable to
    use for studies of beam lines, detector responses, etc. Initially, the
    flux of particles is not too important, but we will later wish to have
    pretty good estimates of the fluxes (as well as one can manage in the
    absence of a good body of constraining data).

    Thank you.
    Joe Comfort
    -------------------------------------
    No PHYSICS...PEATHRESH
     IDpart Number
     gamma 107454
     e+ 3133
     e- 3415
     ntrno 0
     mu+ 38
     mu- 28
     pi0 0
     pi+ 3562
     pi- 2600
     K0L 143
     K+ 237
     K- 67
     n 8890
     p 131225
     pbar 8
     K0S 0
     eta 0
     Lamda 21
     Sig+ 0
     Sig0 0

    With PHYSICS...PEATHRESH
     IDpart Number
     gamma 161114
     e+ 4641
     e- 4934
     ntrno 0
     mu+ 50
     mu- 50
     pi0 0
     pi+ 5160
     pi- 3807
     K0L 178
     K+ 318
     K- 62
     n 9608
     p 130250
     pbar 1
     K0S 0
     eta 0
     Lamda 64
     Sig+ 0
     Sig0 0


  • Next message: M.Chin@surrey.ac.uk: "Re: delayed (n, gamma)"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Sat Apr 14 2007 - 10:28:48 CEST