RE: [fluka-discuss]: STOP INVALID MATERIAL DENSITY

From: Versaci Roberto <Roberto.Versaci_at_eli-beams.eu>
Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2017 09:41:11 +0000

You're defining natural Europium as a compound of two isotopes Eu-151 and Eu-153 but you're not giving their mass number.

I am not sure what you are referring to here. I am attaching a snapshot of the MATERIAL and COMPOUND cards for nat Eu. I was missing the mass number for natEu (i.e. 151.96) which I added in after your comment. Is this what you were referring to?

What I'm saying is that the Europium definition should look like this (or the equivalent flair snippet in attachment):

MATERIAL 63. 5.2227 151.Eu-151
MATERIAL 63. 5.29195 153.Eu-153
MATERIAL 63. 5.264 natEu

The atomic number A (i.e. What(6)) were missing from your definitions.

I also believe that there's a numerical issue with your BEAMAXES card.
What kind of numerical issue are you referring to? I can't see it. I've checked the beam distribution and direction and it is what I intended it to be, i.e. the beam is along Z direction with beam Z at 22 deg with respect to the geometry X axis. I am attaching a snapshot of the BEAMAXES card.

I'm sorry, this was due to a small pre-editing I did on your original file to remove all the equations. Therefore, I was left with numerical values only (see attachment).



________________________________
From: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it<mailto:owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it> [owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it<mailto:owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it>] on behalf of Mina Nozar [nozarm_at_triumf.ca<mailto:nozarm_at_triumf.ca>]
Sent: 19 July 2017 00:48
To: Eleftherios Skordis; FLUKA discussion list
Subject: Re: [fluka-discuss]: STOP INVALID MATERIAL DENSITY


Helo Lefteris,

I have attached the input file.

This is the first time (in six years) I have seen an error like this. I have checked the material definitions for all materials in the card and none is assigned a density of 0.000 as suggested by the error. If the error did actually point to a specific material (by name or number), then I would be able to track it if.

Let me know if you need the associated biasing files, etc.

Thank you,

Mina

On 2017-07-18 02:22 PM, Eleftherios Skordis wrote:
Hi Mina,

please send us your input file so we can give you a more customised answer.

Kind regards

Lefteris


-----------------------

Eleftherios Skordis
Dep. EN/STI, CERN
CH-1211 GENEVA 23
SWITZERLAND

OFFICE: +41-22-7679541<tel:%2B41-22-7675461>
________________________________
From: Mina Nozar [nozarm_at_triumf.ca<mailto:nozarm_at_triumf.ca>]
Sent: 18 July 2017 21:30
To: Eleftherios Skordis; Vadim Talanov; FLUKA discussion list
Subject: [fluka-discuss]: STOP INVALID MATERIAL DENSITY


Hello everyone,

I've been trying to track an error in my input file and have been able to pin point it.

There seems to be a material that FLUKA is seeing with a density of 0.00 assigned to it.

Now, I have neither intentionally set a density of 0.000 to any material, nor have been able to find a material in my input file with a typo in the density causing such an error.

All I see in the error file is the following message, without any more info. on where FLUKA is seeing an 'invalid material density'.

Invalid density 0.000 for material
Abort called from PRCHCK reason INVALID MATERIAL DENSITY Run stopped!
STOP INVALID MATERIAL DENSITY

So I am wondering how to go about tracking and fixing this bug?

Any insights would be appreciated.

Thank you,

Mina







__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info

europium.png
(image/png attachment: europium.png)

beamaxes.png
(image/png attachment: beamaxes.png)

Received on Thu Jul 20 2017 - 12:39:04 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Jul 20 2017 - 12:39:05 CEST