Re: [fluka-discuss]: which publication of ICRP has reported the lung density equal to 1.05 g/cm3

From: Fasso, Alberto <fasso_at_slac.stanford.edu>
Date: Sat, 2 Feb 2019 16:03:41 +0000

Dear Mahmoudreza,
lung has a local density larger than its average density, due to its alveolar structure.
Look at the FLUKA manual, option MAT-PROP. Example 2 shows how to define a local density of Lung (1.05 g/cm3) with command
MATERIAL, as well as an average density (0.3 g/cm3) by means of option MAT-PROP.

Alberto
________________________________________
From: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it <owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it> on behalf of mrakbari2015_at_ast.ui.ac.ir <mrakbari2015_at_ast.ui.ac.ir>
Sent: Friday, February 1, 2019 8:56 PM
To: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org; Vasilis.Vlachoudis_at_cern.ch
Subject: [fluka-discuss]: which publication of ICRP has reported the lung density equal to 1.05 g/cm3

Dear FLUKA experts
During the lung tissue simulation, I encountered to 1.05 g/cm3 for lung tissue densiy in the flair material data library?
In which publication of the ICRP this value was reported? isn't it too high for lung? 0.26 g/cm3 would be a proper choise?
however, lung tumor (GTV/ITV)might have the same density as 1.05 g/cm3.
Best wishes,

Mahmoudreza Akbari

Ph.D. Candidate in Medical Radiation Engineering
Department of Nuclear Engineering,
Faculty of Advanced Sciences and Technologies,
University of Isfahan, Isfahan, Iran.
Alternative Email: mrakbari2012_at_gmail.com
Tel: 0098-09304403165


__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Sat Feb 02 2019 - 18:15:25 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Sat Feb 02 2019 - 18:15:29 CET