Date: Fri, 5 Apr 2019 17:19:18 +0530
Dear FLUKA Experts,
Regarding the USRBDX output, sometimes it has been observed that in some of
the energy bin the relative statistical errors in the result of differential
fluxes as a function of energy (integrated over solid angle) are greater
than 10%. But the corresponding relative statistical errors in the result of
cumulative fluxes as a function of energy (integrated over solid angle) are
less than 10% .
Can this result be assumed to be reliable since for Monte Carlo simulation,
the statistical error should be less than 10% for the reliability of the
result.
One sample output of differential fluxes and cumulative fluxes in USRBDX is
attached here.
Thanks and Regards
Riya Dey
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
(image/png attachment: cumulative_flux_as_a_function_of_energy.PNG)
(image/png attachment: differential_flux_as_a_function_of_energy.PNG)