Re: Difference between ALL-PART linked to USERWEIG and DOSE-EQ?

Hi,

in the old version of FLUKA you could score equivalent dose rate, as you
write, using a USRBIN card for the fluence of all particles linked to
the selected DCYTIME through
the DCYSCORE card, and giving to the SDUM of the USRBIN the correct name
for the fluence-to-dose conversion factor (e.g. AMB74) where you have
"long-0h".
Therefore, you had to create the proper executable file linking FLUKA to
the deq99c.f and run using this executable.

In the new FLUKA the use of the deq99c.f routine is replaced by the card
AUXSCORE through which you select the fluence-to-dose conversion factor
set (AMB74, EWT74 ... ).

In your pictures probably you are comparing fluence to dose, that's why
they look different.
Hope it helps

Lucia

On Mar 24, 2009 05:46 PM, "Fernandez-Hernando, JL (Juan)"
<juan.fernandez-hernando_at_stfc.ac.uk> wrote:

> Dear FLUKA users,
>
> I have always used to score the residual equivalent dose rate the
> USRBIN scoring all particle fluence linked to an IRRPROFI card
> together with DCYTIMES card and a USERWEIG card. I've notice that in
> the new version I can score DOSE-EQ. I would think that the results
> from both USRBIN should be the same but they aren't. What are the
> differences between them?
>
> that would be the code I use:
>
> IRRPROFI 2.88D+4 6.67D+16
> DCYTIMES 0.0 3600.0 8.64D+04
>
> USERWEIG 1.0 0.0
>
> DCYSCORE 1.0 long-0h USRBIN
> USRBIN 10.0 ALL-PART -47.0 250.0 2.5 250.0long-0h
> USRBIN -250.0 -2.5 -250.0 100.0 1.0 100.0&
>
> DCYSCORE 1.0 redrl-0h USRBIN
> USRBIN 10.0 DOSE-EQ -77. 250.0 2.5 250.0redrl-0h
> USRBIN -250.0 -2.5 -250.0 100.0 1.0 100.0&
>
> And find attached the two plots that came out from them.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Luis
>
>
>
>
>
> <http://www.plentyoffish.com/member9322419.htm>
Received on Wed Mar 25 2009 - 11:14:26 CET