Re: Tritium source

Oleg,

I don't see the input attached, just a repetition of your email, but anyway, from the input (or fraction of input) file that you sent yesterday, aside from the lack of geometry definition, I can see right away that your beam definition seems wrong, as you are defining 3-H via HI-PROPE, while you should simple type TRITON as SDUM in the BEAM card, please check:

http://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=man_onl&sub=12

Mario

On Oct 27, 2012, at 5:30 AM, Oleg Tkach wrote:

Dear Mario,

I am sending input file about Tritium source…

Thanks in advance,
Oleg

Fri, 26 Oct 2012 17:50:28 -0700 от "Santana, Mario" <msantana_at_SLAC.Stanford.EDU<mailto:msantana_at_SLAC.Stanford.EDU>>:
Hi Oleg,

Your input seems very minimalist... did you just copy a fraction of the input file or did you altogether forget to define the geometry?

M.

-----Original Message-----
From: owner-fluka-discuss@mi.infn.it<https://e.mail.ru/cgi-bin/sentmsg?compose&To=owner%2dfluka%2ddiscuss@mi.infn.it> [mailto:owner-fluka-discuss@mi.infn.it] On Behalf Of tkatsh65@mail.ru<https://e.mail.ru/cgi-bin/sentmsg?compose&To=tkatsh65@mail.ru>
Sent: Friday, October 26, 2012 5:58 AM
To: fluka-discuss@fluka.org<https://e.mail.ru/cgi-bin/sentmsg?compose&To=fluka%2ddiscuss@fluka.org>
Subject: Tritium source

Dear FLUKA authors,

I have tried to setup Tritium source:

* ISOTOPE SOURCE

BEAM 0.0 0.0 1.E4 0.0 0.0 1.0ISOTOPE

HI-PROPE 1. 3. 0.0

………

RADDECAY 2. 1. 2.0 222000. 0 1.

PHYSICS 2. EVAPORAT

DISCARD -ANEUTRIE

………

DCYSCORE -1. El_MESH AneuMESH USRBIN

………

* Pictures

*

USRBIN 10. ELECTRON -22. 0.5 5. 5.El_MESH

USRBIN -0.5 -5. -5. 1. 100. 100.&

*

USRBIN 10. ANEUTRIE -22. 0.5 5. 5.AneuMESH

USRBIN -0.5 -5. -5. 1. 100. 100.&

………

But nothing happened.

Is it possible?

Thanks in advance,

Oleg

<Letter - Tritium source_2 .doc>
Received on Sat Oct 27 2012 - 21:14:33 CEST