RE: [fluka-discuss]: RE: feature reduced with the upgrade of flair version 2. : user-1D plots

From: Angelo Infantino <angeloinfa_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Wed, 4 Jun 2014 10:58:42 +0200

Dear Vasilis,
It would be very useful also for me and my group to have restored this particular option, even if the spectrum integration is already available inside the sum.lis file.
Thank you

Angelo


> Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2014 17:46:38 +0200
> From: wurth_at_ipno.in2p3.fr
> To: Vasilis.Vlachoudis_at_cern.ch
> CC: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org; owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it
> Subject: Re: [fluka-discuss]: RE: feature reduced with the upgrade of flair version 2. : user-1D plots
>
> Hello Vasilis,
>
> I understand.
> I don't know about the other users, but I use this plotting option a
> lot.
>
> So in my own selfish way, I would be glad if this one was restored.
>
> But of course, I can get it back by some other way like I did in the
> pre-flair times with gnuplot or excel, or even with flair by using the
> gnuplot command window and issuing the adequate command. A little bit
> tedious but it works.
>
> Regards.
> Sebastien.
>
>
> Le 2014-06-02 16:12, Vasilis Vlachoudis a écrit :
> > Hi Sebastien,
> >
> > I've tried to minimize the options in order to avoid the confusion of
> > the users, so I left only
> > two choices the "normal" plotting and the "isolethargic". The DX*Y
> > no longer exists.
> >
> > You can make your integration from the _sum.lis using the cumulative
> > output.
> >
> > Maybe this specific one I can restore.
> >
> > V.
> >
> > ________________________________________
> > From: wurth [wurth_at_ipno.in2p3.fr]
> > Sent: 02 June 2014 14:43
> > To: Vasilis Vlachoudis
> > Cc: Fluka discuss (fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org)
> > Subject: feature reduced with the upgrade of flair version 2. : user-1D
> > plots
> >
> > Hello Vasilis,
> >
> > Thanks for the great work.
> >
> > I have a question : with the new version of flair, whenever a USER-1D
> > plot is of interest, for example for a usrtrack card result :
> >
> > Now, in the field "value" we got only 2 choices : "Y" or "<X>*Y",
> > whereas before we got several other choices and the very interesting
> > "DX*Y" which was very helpful to integrate immediately over E.
> >
> > Is this bad luck or is there something that I missed?
> >
> > Thanks a lot.
> > Cheers.
> >
> > Sebastien.
>
                                               
Received on Wed Jun 04 2014 - 12:22:58 CEST