Dear FLUKA experts:
I¡¯m a new Fluka user, I have a question in describing a beam. I have two questions (they could also be found in the attachment).
Firstly I don¡¯t understand the example in page 78 of the user manual as follows:
Example:
* The next option cards describe a 10 GeV¡¯ proton beam with a divergence of
* 50 mrad and a gaussian profile in the "beam x"-direction and in the
* "beam y"-direction described by standard deviations sigma_x = 1. cm
* (FWHM = 2.36 cm) and sigma_y = 0.5 cm (FWHM = 1.18 cm). The beam starts
* from point (0,0,0) and is directed in a direction perpendicular to the
* "geometry x" axis, at 45 degrees with respect to both "geometry y" and
* "geometry z". The "beam x" axis has cosines 1,0,0 and the "beam z"
* axis has cosines 0, cos(pi/4), cos(pi/4)
*...+....1....+....2....+....3....+....4....+....5....+....6....+....7....+...
BEAM -10.0 0.0 50.0 -2.36 -1.18 1.0 PROTON
BEAMPOS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7071068 0.0
BEAMAXES 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.7071068 0.7071068
My question is, ¡°beam z¡± axis is exactly the beam direction, why WHAT(5) (direction cosine of the beam with respect to the y-axis of the beam reference frame) in ¡°BEAMPOS¡± is 0.7071068? I think it should be 0. I¡¯m really confused with it, could you please answer me the question?
My second question is:
I want to describe a 1GeV proton with a guass profile in the geometry y-direction described by standard deviations sigma_y = 1cm, the beam starts from point(0,0,0) and is perpendicular to the "geometry x" axis, and at 60 and 30 degrees with respect to "geometry y" and "geometry z".
My description is:
BEAM -1 0 0 0 -2.36 1.0 PROTON
BEAMPOS 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.5 0.0
BEAMAXES 1.0 0.0 0.0 0 0 1
In fact, I define the beam reference frame exactly the same with the geometry frame, and then I define the beam direction with BEAMPOS. Is it correct? I really need your help. Thank you very much.
Received on Sat Jun 21 2014 - 17:31:07 CEST