RE: [fluka-discuss]: Energy deposited: AUXSCORE vs SCORE

From: Mitthumsiri, Warit <warit_at_slac.stanford.edu>
Date: Tue, 29 Jul 2014 10:31:24 -0700

Dear Alberto, Francesco,

Thank you for your kind help. I found a mistake in my input file. It is just that my region number in the USRBIN shouldn't have started with 18, but should've been 2. I fixed that and can confirm that the output for both methods are identical. Sorry for bother your time. But at least, I can assure other users that they can use either method.

Thanks!

-Warit

________________________________________
From: Francesco Cerutti [Francesco.Cerutti_at_cern.ch]
Sent: Monday, July 28, 2014 9:25 AM
To: Mitthumsiri, Warit
Cc: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Subject: Re: [fluka-discuss]: Energy deposited: AUXSCORE vs SCORE

Hi Warit,

indeed SCORE and USRBIN per region give exactly the same output and I
cannot find any evidence of a different behavior.
Can you please send your input file to crosscheck your findings?

Best

Francesco

**************************************************
Francesco Cerutti
CERN-EN/STI
CH-1211 Geneva 23
Switzerland
tel. ++41 22 7678962
fax ++41 22 7668854

On Fri, 25 Jul 2014, Mitthumsiri, Warit wrote:

>
> Dear all,
>
> I would like to record the energy deposited in each region. I tried comparing the output from these cards:
>
> *******
> SCORE 208.0 211.0
> *******
>
> and
>
> *******
> USRBIN 12.0 EM-ENRGY 26.0 299.0 EMEdp
> USRBIN 18.0 1.0 &
> AUXSCORE USRBIN ALL-PART EMEdp
> USRBIN 12.0 ENERGY 28.0 299.0 TotEdp
> USRBIN 18.0 1.0 &
> AUXSCORE USRBIN ALL-PART TotEdp
> *******
>
> which should have given the same output (energy deposited / beam particle, without normalization by region volume), but they give significantly different output. The output from the SCORE card looks more correct. Does anyone have any idea?
>
> -Warit
>
>
Received on Tue Jul 29 2014 - 20:49:16 CEST