Hi Vittorio,
Sorry for the late reply, something else needed my attention.
I have compiled, linked and ran using the example, my predecessors, and
my own SOURCE subroutines, and ran the builtin and default. For each of
them I redirected the stdout and stderr to a file.
I have included those files, and all other generated files (*.err,
*.log, *.out, etc.) as well as the SOURCE subroutines and input files.
I have done this for both my laptop running Arch and my workstation
running SL6.6, and have attached them in compressed archives.
I have also attached the commands I used to do this, for clarity and
to ensure I am not missing fundamental understanding in the linking
process. (Which I might be).
(for size constraints, its is compressed using XZ)
The SOURCE subroutine is just the same as the example, but with the
weighting calculated differently. My subroutine looks radically
different, however it is just written in a different style.
If there is anything else that I can send, please let me know. It is
imperative I get this simple thing working.
Best regards,
On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 08:09:53PM +0200, Vittorio Boccone wrote:
> Dear Matthew,
> sure Arch is a rolling distro. What I meant was "versions" plural of the
> base-devel pack group. Anyway I see I've got almost the same devel packages
> group as you.
>
> gcc/gfortran 4.9.1 is not what I would call stable for the centos.
>
> To get a new g++/gfortran suite on the CentOS I would try the devtoolset
> 2.1 which provides all the gcc.gfortran 4.8.2 in a nutshell.
> [see http://linux.web.cern.ch/linux/devtoolset/#dts21 and other RH/CentOS
> posts on the list]
>
> I have some simulation which uses a custom source routing which are both
> running on SL6.6 or Arch.
> It's a bit complicate to reproduce your error w/o the input or source or to
> give you some hint w/o the log or err files.
> Could you post some more detail?
> Best,
> V.
>
> On Wed, Apr 22, 2015 at 6:27 PM, Matthew Parnell <m.parnell_at_lancaster.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi Vittorio,
> >
> > Arch is a rolling release, therefore there is no 'version' of it.
> > However I have using gfortran 4.9.2 20150304, ld 2.25.0, and fluka
> > 2011.2c gfor64bitAA.
> >
> > I have attempted to compile and link the example SOURCE subrouteine,
> > $FLUPRO/usermvax/source.f
> >
> > I am not getting errors or warnings in the compliation or linking,
> > however the program stops running after 5s. Similar to my own SOURCE and
> > the SOURCE by my predecessor [which he apparently got to work].
> >
> > What is interesting, is leaving the SOURCE command within the input file
> > and running fluka runs for a similar time of 5s, whereas leaving out the
> > SOURCE card runs correctly for around 12mins.
> >
> > To ensure it's not my laptop, I tried with my workstation running
> > Scientific Linux 6.6, with the gfortran updated to 4.9.1 [FLUKA needed
> > gfortran >= 4.6, SL6 has 4.4.7].
> >
> > My workstation seems to have the same issues. My SOURCE, my predecessors
> > SOURCE, and the example SOURCE subroutines.
> >
> > However I both my laptop (Arch) and my workstation (SL6.6) work without
> > the SOURCE card with the default rfluka, and run for around 12mins, with
> > output.
> >
> > Now I guess I am running it wrong and/or it's a linking issue, not my
> > source, and not my input file.
> >
> > Any ideas?
--
Matthew Parnell
m.parnell_at_lancaster.ac.uk
thew Parnell
arnell_at_lancaster.ac.uk
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Mon Apr 27 2015 - 19:53:30 CEST