To avoid misunderstandings ... more exactly the Flair option for
COALESCE makes sense only for the development version. COALESCE
with what(1)=1 makes sense for the public version as well, and it
is even recommended in most cases as per release notes
Alfredo
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Alfredo Ferrari || Tel.: +41.22.76.76119 |
| CERN-EN/STI || Fax.: +41.22.76.69474 |
| 1211 Geneva 23 || e-mail: Alfredo.Ferrari_at_cern.ch |
| Switzerland || |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Mon, 2 May 2016, Vittorio Boccone wrote:
> Hi Emilio,
> This option has only sense for the Fluka develoment version which is not yet release.
>
> Best,
> Vittorio
>
>> On 02 May 2016, at 04:56, Emilio Ciuffoli <emilio_at_impcas.ac.cn> wrote:
>>
>> Dear FLUKA experts,
>>
>> I heva a question on the PHYSICS: COALECEnce card: I found a difference between the manual and the instruction implemented in Flair; which one is correct?
>>
>> In the manual is written:
>> WHAT(1) : coalescence flag
>> < 0.0 : false (no coalescence)
>> = 0.0 : ignored
>> > 0.0 : true, coalescence is activated
>> Default = no coalescence
>> However, in Flair, if I leave the cursor on the WHAT(1) box, there is written
>>
>> "icl0+icl1*10000. icl0= coalescence is activated, icl1= deuteron coalescence".
>>
>> Which one is right? Is there any difference between WHAT(1)=1 and WHAT(1)=1001? I tried in few cases, but I didn't find any difference.
>>
>> Best Regards
>> Emilio
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id?c_info
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Mon May 02 2016 - 15:57:36 CEST