Many thanks. Could you please inform me about the threshold of energy for using BME and starting to use
RQMD and DPMJET link?
Best Regards,
Masoomeh
________________________________
From: Santana, Mario [msantana_at_slac.stanford.edu]
Sent: 23 January 2017 08:10
To: Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri; fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Subject: Re: [fluka-discuss]: DPMJET link
Hi Masoometh,
For 250 MeV/u I believe you can’t use BME. The reply you may be referring at quotes 110 MeV/u, though, which then would be OK, but in your original message with subject DPMJET link you mentioned a higher value, so it will all depend which energy you actually need.
-Mario
From: Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri <masoomeh.yarmohammadi.satri_at_cern.ch>
Date: Sunday, January 22, 2017 at 10:47 PM
To: "Santana, Mario" <msantana_at_slac.stanford.edu>, fluka-discuss <fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org>
Subject: RE: [fluka-discuss]: DPMJET link
Dear Mario,
According to the reply, I received from the question in the Flukadiscuss with the title: Carbon beam-DPMJET link, I don't need to make the link and the run can be handled with BME that is already in the standard library.
Best regards,
Masoomeh
________________________________
From: Santana, Mario [msantana_at_slac.stanford.edu]
Sent: 23 January 2017 03:36
To: Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri; fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Subject: Re: [fluka-discuss]: DPMJET link
Hi Masoometh,
Not sure if this comes too late.
If you are using ion beams in excess of 150 MeV/u (and below 5 GeV/u), you want to use RQMD, thus you must run the executable that you obtain after typing the following in your terminal
$FLUPRO/flutil/ldpmqmd
You can also achieve the same with Flair, if you are more comfortable with that.
As for the necessary number of particles, in order to answer this, you want to run a short simulation and look at the variance of the results, then scale that variance down with the square root of the simulation size, i.e. 100 times more primaries will in average decrease your error bar by a factor 10. As a rule of thumb, at the end of the day you don’t want to use results with relative errors>~30% (this number really depends on particular circumstances), so with that you can compute how many particles you need.
-Mario
From: <owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it> on behalf of Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri <masoomeh.yarmohammadi.satri_at_cern.ch>
Date: Sunday, January 8, 2017 at 1:01 AM
To: fluka-discuss <fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org>
Subject: [fluka-discuss]: DPMJET link
Dear All,
I want to exposed a target made of Bone to a 250MeV/nmu (nuclear mass unit) CARBON beam. Then I want to look the DoseEQ data at three different distances.
Could you please let me know how can I produce the data related to this simulation at the three position. If I need to do this run with DPMJET link? Could you please let me know how I make this link and how many particles is appropriate for doing this run? I can merge and plot data the same as before that I don't work with this link in proton of electron beams?
The file is attached
Regards,
Masoomeh
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Mon Jan 23 2017 - 09:45:33 CET