Re: FLUKA: BEAMPOS - NEGATIVE argument

From: Alberto Fasso' (fasso@SLAC.Stanford.EDU)
Date: Fri Mar 12 2004 - 00:04:14 CET

  • Next message: Alfredo Ferrari: "Re: FLUKA: BEAMPOS - NEGATIVE argument"

    Hi Kerry,

    "NEGATIVE" still works (checked). It is likely that there is something
    wrong in your input. Can you please send it so we can have a look?

    Alberto

    On Thu, 11 Mar 2004, LEE, KERRY T. (JSC-SR) (UHCL) wrote:

    > Hi,
    >
    > In the newest version of FLUKA, 2003_1, I am making use of the NEGATIVE
    > string in the last argument of BEAMPOS. I have done a run with and without
    > the NEGATIVE string and the results are identical. I them modified source.f
    > such that instead of
    >
    > TZ(LSTACK) = TINZ
    >
    > I replace it with
    >
    > TZ(LSTACK) = -TINZ
    >
    > and this does change the direction of the beam as I expect.
    >
    > Can you verify that the NEGATIVE functionality is not working, or am I doing
    > something wrong?
    >
    > Thanks
    > Kerry
    >
    > 

    -- 
Alberto Fassò
SLAC-RP, MS 48, 2575 Sand Hill Road, Menlo Park CA 94025
Phone: (1 650) 926 4762   Fax: (1 650) 926 3569
fasso@slac.stanford.edu
  • Next message: Alfredo Ferrari: "Re: FLUKA: BEAMPOS - NEGATIVE argument"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Mar 12 2004 - 09:01:26 CET