From: Harine, Katherine (Katherine.J.Harine@nasa.gov)
Date: Wed Sep 13 2006 - 20:20:42 CEST
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C6D761.526F34AA
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Are all of the files in the utilities directory, flutil, the same with =
the new version of FLUKA? usysuw.f in both versions appear identical, =
but usxsuw.f in the new versions has differences that appear to be =
spaces in several FORTRAN cards with no functional differences and =
slight differences in FORMAT cards for WRITE statments.
I recall that in a previous release, the common blocks changed. I have =
this question because I have revised several of the utilities for =
particular situations.
Thank you,
- Katherine
------_=_NextPart_001_01C6D761.526F34AA
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7233.69">
<TITLE>Utilities in FLUKA 2006.3</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<BR>
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Are all of the files in the utilities directory, =
flutil, the same with the new version of FLUKA? usysuw.f in both =
versions appear identical, but usxsuw.f in the new versions has =
differences that appear to be spaces in several FORTRAN cards with no =
functional differences and slight differences in FORMAT cards for WRITE =
statments.<BR>
<BR>
I recall that in a previous release, the common blocks changed. I =
have this question because I have revised several of the utilities for =
particular situations.<BR>
<BR>
Thank you,<BR>
<BR>
- Katherine<BR>
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C6D761.526F34AA--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Sep 13 2006 - 21:27:29 CEST