Re: [fluka-discuss]: Fwd: Ta180

From: Luigi Salvatore Esposito <luigi.salvatore.esposito_at_cern.ch>
Date: Mon, 29 May 2017 12:43:56 +0000

Dear Kabytayeva,
Could you be more specific? What’s the disagreement you see?

In any case, for the simulation of radioactive decay you miss some card:
- the irradiation profile (IRRPROFI)
- the decay time (DCYTIMES)
- the scoring associated with the decay times (DCYSCORE)

Please refer to the slides about radioactivity from the last FLUKA course:
https://indico.cern.ch/event/604018/contributions/2435668/attachments/1395470/2242783/19_Activation_2017.pdf

The normalization is set by your application, i.e. by the beam intensity and irradiation intervals that you need to embed in the IRRPROFI.

Hope this could help.
Best regards, luigi


On 26.05.17, 08:34, "owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it on behalf of kabytayeva" <owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it on behalf of kabytayeva_at_jinr.ru> wrote:

    
    
    -------- Исходное сообщение --------
    Тема: Ta180
    Дата: 26.05.2017 09:32
    От: kabytayeva <kabytayeva_at_jinr.ru>
    Кому: Fluka Discuss <fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org>
    
    Hello everybody!
    
    
    I need your help!
    
    
      I am interested in the rad decay of the created 180Ta in the next
    reaction 181Ta(gamma,n)180Ta
    Could you check my code, especially RADDECAY card because my
    calculations are not agree with experiment and I think may be I made
    some mistake...
    I use FLAIR and is it correct I transfer USRBDX units if I choice value
    DX*Y and multiply Y value to the primary electron = 0.6242E13 and a
    result I get photons/cm2/s?
    
    I attach input file
    
    Many thanks!

(Ƨځ맲r*'~&x%Zm 0nߖi'iw
Received on Mon May 29 2017 - 16:02:58 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon May 29 2017 - 16:03:00 CEST