Re: [fluka-discuss]: DCYSCORE USRBDX

From: Luigi Salvatore Esposito <luigi.salvatore.esposito_at_cern.ch>
Date: Tue, 30 May 2017 08:50:42 +0000

Dear Kabytayeva,
I do not understand why you want to divide by the number of bins.

The units of USRBDX are cm-2 GeV-1 sr-1 per incident primary (Note 2 of USRBDX in the manual).
When associated to DCYSCORE with WHAT(1) > 0, the USRBDX provides a fluence rate expressed in units of cm-2 GeV-1 sr-1 s-1, i.e. it takes into account the beam intensity and irradiation profile (Note 1 of DCYSCORE in the manual).

Best regards, luigi

On 30.05.17, 09:09, "owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it on behalf of kabytayeva" <owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it on behalf of kabytayeva_at_jinr.ru> wrote:

    Many thanks for your help!
    
    I've got one more question
    I add
    - the irradiation profile (IRRPROFI) 300s / 6.24E12p/s
    - the decay time (DCYTIMES)
    - the scoring associated with the decay times (DCYSCORE) cooling time 0s
    and USRBDX with Ebins=1000
    I'm interested in what units I will get the results of USRBDX?
      Is ir right that this card normalise( with considering IRRPROFI )
    particles/cm2*s per energy bin? so if I have Ebins=1000 I need the
    results of flair Y value divide to 1000 and I have particles/cm2*s?
    
    __________________________________________________________________________
    You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
    
    

                                                       Ў(╣╞зЩй┌Быз▓цьr╕й╢*'~║&╢мЩиеКx%К╦Z╢mж╧   0¤∙nСпшо▀Цщ■Шi■'i╟ Кwш
Received on Tue May 30 2017 - 11:51:43 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue May 30 2017 - 11:51:45 CEST