Re: [fluka-discuss]:

From: Santana, Mario <>
Date: Mon, 5 Jun 2017 06:16:18 +0000

Hi Mausumi,

Is the difference between the two statistically significant given the variance of the results? If so, you will have to go with the slower method, and for that, since it seems that all other settings are quite optimized (EMF-OFF, discard,… NEWDEFA…), most likely you will not be able to get results any faster.


From: <> on behalf of Mausumi Sengupta Mitra <>
Date: Friday, June 2, 2017 at 3:14 AM
To: fluka-discuss <>
Subject: [fluka-discuss]:

Hi all,

I have a problem regarding muon transport through a material slab. I want to get distribution of angular deviation of monoenergetic muon after being transported through uranium slab. If I use MULSOPT in the input file it is taking very long runtime. But if I run without that card there is significant difference between the two results although errors encountered in results are high. What should be done? The input file is attached herewith.


You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
Received on Mon Jun 05 2017 - 09:32:24 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Jun 05 2017 - 09:32:37 CEST