Re: [fluka-discuss]:

From: Paola Sala <>
Date: Thu, 9 Nov 2017 15:58:45 +0100

Dear Valerio,
could you, please send your input, and a plot of your results?
Probably not relevent, but in a cylindrical geometry it's much better to
use a cylindrical USRBIN. And surely you should not switch off nuclear
interaction if you wish to reproduce reality..they are real!
> Dear Fluka users,
> Good morning, I have to simulate a beam of proton with 230 MeV of energy
> impinging a cylinder of water of 50 cm. I found a Bragg peak at 30 cm of
> depth more or less, but the line falls too slow after the peak. I am
> scoring the total energy in USRBIN with X-Y-Z geometry and the AUXUSRBIN
> to score just the energy of the protons.Should I switch off the nuclear
> reactions with neutrons, maybe using TRESHOLDS and TRE-PART cards to find
> a good Bragg peak, or is there anything else? I' m just a beginner,
> please heeelp me!!
> valerio santoro

Paola Sala
INFN Milano
tel. Milano +39-0250317374
tel. CERN +41-227679148

You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
Received on Thu Nov 09 2017 - 17:19:20 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Thu Nov 09 2017 - 17:19:22 CET