Re: [fluka-discuss]: How to understand the results of USRBDX

From: <shihy_at_ihep.ac.cn>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 08:30:09 +0800

Dear Mikhail,

 

I used one-way scoring. I’ll try to use the BEAMPART. Thanks for your help.

 

Best Wishes,

 

Shy Shi

 

发件人: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it
[mailto:owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it] 代表 Mikhail Polkovnikov <Михаи
л Полковников>
发送时间: 2017年12月18日 2:49
收件人: shihy_at_ihep.ac.cn; fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
主题: Re: [fluka-discuss]: How to understand the results of USRBDX

 

On 15.12.2017 04:58, shihy_at_ihep.ac.cn <mailto:shihy_at_ihep.ac.cn> wrote:

Dear FLUKA experts,

I'm using FLUKA to do some simulation. I set photons as the incident
particle, and in the vacuum. The photons are pointing to hit a 6mm thick
copper, and I set a USRBDX to record the photons from vacuum to copper and
the electrons from copper back to vacuum(the same surface between vacuum and
copper). But the results(sum.lis file) show that about 300 photons across
from vacuum to copper when the incident particle was only one photon. I
don't know the reason. Is the result correct? If so, how to understand that
result? Or it's simply because FLUKA cannot distinguish the incident photon
and secondary photon here?(The number of primaries is 1E8).

 

Thanks for your help!

 

Shy Shi

Dear Shy Shi,

You can use the BEAMPART for WHAT(2) of a USRBDX, that gives you the
incident photons only (primary particles). Did you use one way or two way
scoring in the USRBDX to count number of particles from vacuum to copper?

 

Best regards,

Mikhail

 



__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Mon Dec 18 2017 - 02:43:46 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Dec 18 2017 - 02:43:55 CET