Hi Francesco,
I see. Thanks for your help.
Regards,
Haoyu
> -----原始邮件-----
> 发件人: "Francesco Cerutti" <Francesco.Cerutti_at_cern.ch>
> 发送时间: 2018-10-30 18:14:38 (星期二)
> 收件人: "Haoyu Shi" <shihy_at_ihep.ac.cn>
> 抄送: "Vasilis Vlachoudis" <vasilis.vlachoudis_at_cern.ch>, "fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org" <fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org>
> 主题: Re: [fluka-discuss]: Why "R-phi-Z" and "Region" didn't get same results in USRBIN?
>
>
> Hallo
>
> see
> http://www.fluka.org/web_archive/earchive/new-fluka-discuss/10023.html
>
> Best
>
> Francesco
>
> **************************************************
> Francesco Cerutti
> CERN-EN/STI
> CH-1211 Geneva 23
> Switzerland
> tel. +41 22 7678962
>
> On Tue, 30 Oct 2018, Haoyu Shi wrote:
>
> > Hi Vasilis,
> >
> > Thanks for your help. I see, but I still don’t know, if I just want to get
> > the dose of the whole region, I should multiple the results of the region
> > card by the volume of the region or the R-Phi-Z card?
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
> >
> > Regards,
> > Haoyu
> >
> > 获取 Outlook for iOS
> >
> >
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 30, 2018 at 5:28 PM +0800, "Vasilis Vlachoudis"
> > <Vasilis.Vlachoudis_at_cern.ch> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Haoyu,
> > please note that the USRBIN by region is not normalized by the volume
> > of the region
> > as it is the case of the R-Phi-Z therefore you get this different
> > result.
> >
> > Vasilis
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________________
> > From: Haoyu Shi [shihy_at_ihep.ac.cn]
> > Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2018 10:22
> > To: Vasilis Vlachoudis
> > Cc: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
> > Subject: Re: RE: [fluka-discuss]: Why "R-phi-Z" and "Region" didn't
> > get same results in USRBIN?
> >
> > Hi Vasilis,
> >
> >
> > Thanks for your help. You're right. I have a mistake. But even this,
> > the layer1 region should be twice as the R-Phi-Z in 81 USRBIN and
> > layer2 should be twice as 82 USRBIN, but actually, even in the wrong
> > input file(81 USRBIN from 0 to 6.25 while layer1 region from -6.25 to
> > 6.25), the results of 81 USRBIN is higher than layer1.
> >
> >
> > I also correct the range, and both 81 and 82 USRBIN are almost twice
> > than layer1 and layer2 region.
> >
> >
> > I have attached the lis file, so you can see it without running and
> > waiting(51 for layer1 region, 52 for layer2 region, 81 and 82 for
> > R-Phi-Z). And I still get confused by these results.
> >
> >
> > Thanks a lot!
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Haoyu
> >
> >
> >
> > -----原始邮件-----
> > 发件人:"Vasilis Vlachoudis" <Vasilis.Vlachoudis_at_cern.ch>
> > 发送时间:2018-10-25 15:53:43 (星期四)
> > 收件人: "Haoyu Shi" <shihy_at_ihep.ac.cn>,
> > "fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org" <fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org>
> > 抄送:
> > 主题: RE: [fluka-discuss]: Why "R-phi-Z" and "Region"
> > didn't get same results in USRBIN?
> >
> > Hi Haoyu
> > isn't it normal to be half your R-Phi-Z is half of the Z of the
> > region
> > e.g your layer1 region extends from -6.25 to 6.2 in Z
> > while your 81 USRBIN is from 0 to 6.25
> >
> > The same for 82
> >
> > Cheers
> > Vasilis
> >
> >
> > ____________________________________________________________________________
> > From: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it
> > [owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it] on behalf of Haoyu Shi
> > [shihy_at_ihep.ac.cn]
> > Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2018 10:45
> > To: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
> > Subject: [fluka-discuss]: Why "R-phi-Z" and "Region" didn't get
> > same results in USRBIN?
> >
> > Dear FLUKA Experts,
> >
> >
> > I'm simulating the detector backgrounds. The detector is a
> > cylinder with 0.005cm in thickness and 6.25 cm in length and
> > made by silicon. Some electrons/positrons generate by a source
> > file would pass the detector, and I want to get the DOSE in the
> > detector. So I used a USRBIN card with "Region" mode and the
> > other with "R-phi-Z" mode, both particle types was "DOSE". And
> > the last card, I set only 1 bin in R,Phi and Z. So, to my
> > knowledge, these two cards should get the same result. But not,
> > the second one is almost 2 times than the first one. What's the
> > reason for this?
> >
> >
> > The input file and the source file have been attached.
> >
> >
> > Any help or comment would be appreciated.
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> > Haoyu
> >
> >
> >
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Wed Oct 31 2018 - 10:26:39 CET