Dear Po-Wen Fang,
when you ask DOSE-EQ scoring, the result is already in pS/primary, both
for USRBIN and USERBDX, in your case with the AMB74 coefficients. The
results should NOT be converted again. We'll better specify in the
manual.
There is, though, a normalization to be done: USRBIN by region do not
include volume calculation, this is left to the user. I mean that the
results of the USRBIN by region have to be divided by the region voulme.
Hope this helps
Paola
> Dear Fluka experts,
>
> Sorry that the .inp files are missing in the last mail.
>
> Best,
>
> ---
> Po-Wen Fang
> PhD student
> Institute of Nuclear Engineering and Science,
> National Tsing Hua University
> Hsinchu, Taiwan 30013
> Phone: 886-3-5715131#34301
>
> Po-Wen Fang 於 2020-02-18 14:51 寫到:
>> Dear Fluka experts,
>>
>> I try to verify the ambient dose equivalent using both USRBIN and
>> USRBDX CARD.
>>
>> For the USRBIN CARD case, the USRBIN is set as scoring DOSE-EQ,
>> AUXSCORE is set as PHOTON-pass filter and AMB74 for SDUM column. The
>> result is considered as pSv/s and uncertainty with percentage.
>>
>> For the USRBDX case, the USRBDX is set as scoring DOSE-EQ as well,
>> AUXSCORE is set as PHOTON-pass filter and AMB74 for SDUM column. The
>> result is considered as # of photon/GeV/cm2/s and uncertainty with
>> percentage. Ambient dose equivalent conversion factor is applied using
>> adeph.dat providing on the FLUKA website.
>>
>> The final result is asked to present as Sv/hr. While the two different
>> cards lead to dramatic discrepancy. Am I misunderstanding the units or
>> anything toward the results?
>>
>> Best and looking forward for your reply,
Paola Sala
INFN Milano
tel. Milano +39-0250317374
tel. CERN +41-227679148
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Sun Mar 08 2020 - 18:23:50 CET