Re: AW: crash in geoskp?

There are region overlap probems in your geometry. please debug your
input file by employing SimpleGeo. you will find the problems.
for example, Point -0.06, -3.23, 102.29 found in EXTVAC,ARIA
........

Olaf Hartmann wrote:
> Hi Florian,
>
> interesting, I don't have any .err file, and the .out file is very
> short, in fact it stops right after the DEFAULTS card.
>
> However, even if I omit the redefining of argon (which btw did not cause
> errors in the past), the error reappears.
>
> Cheers
> Olaf.
>
>
>
> Sommerer, Florian wrote:
>> Dear Olaf,
>>
>> As written in the *.out and *.err files the run is determined because
>> you are redefining ARGON as meterial number 9 but is alredy
>> pre-defined as material number 20.
>>
>> Cheers, Florian
>>
>>
>>
>> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- Von: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it
>> [mailto:owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it] Im Auftrag von Olaf Hartmann
>> Gesendet: Montag, 21. September 2009 17:02 An:
>> fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org Betreff: crash in geoskp?
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I took some elder FLUKA input file of mine and tried to run it within
>> the current environment. I get the generic error message
>>
>> Running fluka in /home/olaf/fluka/myfluka/fluka_7585
>>
>> ======================= Running FLUKA for cycle # 1
>> =======================
>>
>> /home/olaf/fluka/flutil/rfluka: line 338: 7610 Aborted (core dumped)
>> ${EXE} < $INPN 2> $LOGF > $LOGF
>>
>> Opening the core file with gdb, the backtrace gives
>>
>> (gdb) bt #0 0x00110416 in __kernel_vsyscall () #1 0x00158690 in
>> raise () from /lib/libc.so.6 #2 0x00159f91 in abort () from
>> /lib/libc.so.6 #3 0x0011897b in sig_die () from /usr/lib/libg2c.so.0
>> #4 0x0011cb92 in f__fatal () from /usr/lib/libg2c.so.0 #5
>> 0x00122df0 in s_rsfe () from /usr/lib/libg2c.so.0 #6 0x080fa751 in
>> geoskp_ (what=0x1, sdum=0x960a2e0, __g77_length_sdum=8) at
>> geoskp.f:173 #7 0x0804dda4 in flukam_ (iflgeo=0x85e0b68) at
>> flukam.f:1419 #8 0x08049a72 in MAIN__ () at fluka.f:290 #9
>> 0x085e0a49 in main ()
>>
>> I presume there's a problem with the geometry? Somebody has a hint?
>>
>> Cheers Olaf.
>>
>>
>
>
>
Received on Tue Sep 22 2009 - 11:40:56 CEST