Can not follow the results of example in FLUKA web

From: Hantao Jing <jinght_at_mail.ihep.ac.cn>
Date: Mon, 02 May 2011 18:52:49 +0800

Dear FLUKA experts,
         I want to follow the results of "Example of dose
calculation using FLUKA in context of an experiment performed at the
INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (LNF) to calculate the dose
produced by gas bremsstrahlung at the ADONE electron-positron storage
ring (http://fluka.php?id=examples&sub=example2). Therefore,
I download the input file of gasbrem.inp and run it with the following
command:
$FLUPRO/flutil/rfluka -N0 -M10 gasbresm&
The FLUKA version is fluka2008.3d. Then, the results is obtained by
usbsuw program:
1
    Cartesian binning n. 1 "First " , generalized particle n. 208
       X coordinate: from -1.4265E+00 to 1.4265E+00 cm, 9 bins (
3.1700E-01 cm wide)
       Y coordinate: from -1.4265E+00 to 1.4265E+00 cm, 9 bins (
3.1700E-01 cm wide)
       Z coordinate: from 2.1170E+02 to 2.1179E+02 cm, 1 bins (
8.8900E-02 cm wide)
       Data follow in a matrix A(ix,iy,iz), format (1(5x,1p,10(1x,e11.4)))

       accurate deposition along the tracks requested
        4.2517E-06 5.2404E-06 6.3007E-06 7.1450E-06 7.4702E-06
7.0821E-06 6.1108E-06 5.3350E-06 4.0904E-06 5.3021E-06
        6.9242E-06 9.0744E-06 1.0929E-05 1.1615E-05 1.0940E-05
9.1046E-06 7.1023E-06 5.1818E-06 6.3525E-06 9.0383E-06
        1.3133E-05 1.7996E-05 2.1170E-05 1.8402E-05 1.3152E-05
9.3588E-06 6.0706E-06 7.1982E-06 1.1318E-05 1.8818E-05
        3.2732E-05 4.3062E-05 3.2938E-05 1.8867E-05 1.1458E-05
7.2968E-06 7.8073E-06 1.2400E-05 2.2234E-05 4.8802E-05
        8.0744E-05 4.8871E-05 2.1742E-05 1.2263E-05 7.6456E-06
7.3533E-06 1.1392E-05 1.8975E-05 3.2817E-05 4.3732E-05
        3.2604E-05 1.9071E-05 1.1172E-05 7.1886E-06 6.3338E-06
9.0320E-06 1.3372E-05 1.8669E-05 2.0860E-05 1.8591E-05
        1.3316E-05 9.1300E-06 6.4121E-06 5.2601E-06 7.0427E-06
9.0760E-06 1.1276E-05 1.1949E-05 1.0938E-05 9.3113E-06
        6.9504E-06 5.2326E-06 4.1439E-06 5.3743E-06 6.1863E-06
7.0768E-06 7.4555E-06 7.0991E-06 6.3421E-06 5.1644E-06
        4.1256E-06

       Percentage errors follow in a matrix A(ix,iy,iz), format
(1(5x,1p,10(1x,e11.4)))

        2.2964E+00 1.6554E+00 1.6183E+00 1.2396E+00 1.7084E+00
1.4425E+00 1.8012E+00 1.9117E+00 2.0120E+00 1.0476E+00
        1.3214E+00 1.6861E+00 7.5966E-01 8.8235E-01 1.2887E+00
1.2867E+00 1.5561E+00 1.8029E+00 1.5129E+00 9.5464E-01
        9.7567E-01 9.8942E-01 7.1862E-01 1.4051E+00 1.2920E+00
9.1504E-01 1.7898E+00 1.2718E+00 1.0728E+00 1.2945E+00
        8.4007E-01 4.0738E-01 7.4852E-01 1.0894E+00 1.2322E+00
1.2961E+00 1.7421E+00 1.4518E+00 6.7243E-01 4.4831E-01
        5.5289E-01 5.1126E-01 6.5050E-01 8.1552E-01 1.4150E+00
7.6730E-01 1.1712E+00 9.0391E-01 5.7001E-01 6.3703E-01
        6.6893E-01 1.0929E+00 4.7263E-01 9.7158E-01 1.4058E+00
9.7550E-01 8.3666E-01 9.6425E-01 9.5974E-01 1.0777E+00
        1.1423E+00 1.1156E+00 1.4287E+00 1.4051E+00 1.4547E+00
1.5493E+00 1.3439E+00 1.5610E+00 7.8682E-01 1.1736E+00
        1.6611E+00 1.9968E+00 1.9193E+00 2.2169E+00 1.6782E+00
1.2294E+00 1.6989E+00 2.0874E+00 8.2612E-01 1.8507E+00
        2.0287E+00

  From the results, we can find the large difference with Figure 1 at
web. Why the difference exist for two results?

     On the other hand, I use the results from Figure 1 to calculate the
dose rate of First dosemeter:
the maximum value in Figure 1 is about 3.2432E-5 GeV/cm^3;
the factor to coverse to Gy unit: 1.6E-7/2.64;
the number of electrons for 1 mA is about 6.24E15 e/s;
the pressure ratio of atmospheric pressure to the operating
pressure of the machine (133.0 nPa = 10^--9 torr) is about 7.59E11;
So the dose rate in uGy/mA is 3.2432E-5 * (1.6E-7/2.64) * 6.24E15 * 10E6
/ 7.59E11 = 0.0159436 uGy/mA;
But the results in TABLE 3 in NIMB 88(1994) 345 is 1510 uGy/mA, what is
wrong with my calculated results?
       Thank you very much !

Hantao Jing

2011-5-2

--------------070707070002070400060603
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN">
<html>
<head>
</head>
<body bgcolor="#ffffff" text="#000000">
Dear FLUKA experts,<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; I want to follow the results of "<span class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;"><a
  href="fluka.php?id=examples&amp;sub=example2"
  style="border-bottom: 1px dashed rgb(29, 146, 47); text-decoration: none; color: rgb(29, 146, 47);">Example
of<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><span
  style="font-weight: bold;">dose calculation</span><span
  class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>using FLUKA in context of an
experiment performed at the INFN Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati (LNF)
to calculate the dose produced by<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span><span
  style="font-weight: bold;">gas bremsstrahlung</span><span
  class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp;</span>at the ADONE electron-positron
storage ring.</a></span></span>", Therefore,<br>
I download the input file of gasbrem.inp and run it with the following
command:<br>
$FLUPRO/flutil/rfluka -N0 -M10 gasbresm&amp;<br>
The FLUKA version is fluka2008.3d. Then,&nbsp; the&nbsp; results&nbsp; is obtained&nbsp; by
<span class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: courier; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">usbsuw
program:<br>
1<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp; Cartesian binning n.&nbsp;&nbsp; 1&nbsp; "First&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; " , generalized particle n.&nbsp; 208<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; X coordinate: from -1.4265E+00 to&nbsp; 1.4265E+00 cm,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 9 bins (
3.1700E-01 cm wide)<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Y coordinate: from -1.4265E+00 to&nbsp; 1.4265E+00 cm,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 9 bins (
3.1700E-01 cm wide)<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Z coordinate: from&nbsp; 2.1170E+02 to&nbsp; 2.1179E+02 cm,&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1 bins (
8.8900E-02 cm wide)<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Data follow in a matrix A(ix,iy,iz), format
(1(5x,1p,10(1x,e11.4)))<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; accurate deposition along the tracks requested<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 4.2517E-06&nbsp; 5.2404E-06&nbsp; 6.3007E-06&nbsp; 7.1450E-06&nbsp; 7.4702E-06&nbsp;
7.0821E-06&nbsp; 6.1108E-06&nbsp; 5.3350E-06&nbsp; 4.0904E-06&nbsp; 5.3021E-06<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 6.9242E-06&nbsp; 9.0744E-06&nbsp; 1.0929E-05&nbsp; 1.1615E-05&nbsp; 1.0940E-05&nbsp;
9.1046E-06&nbsp; 7.1023E-06&nbsp; 5.1818E-06&nbsp; 6.3525E-06&nbsp; 9.0383E-06<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.3133E-05&nbsp; 1.7996E-05&nbsp; 2.1170E-05&nbsp; 1.8402E-05&nbsp; 1.3152E-05&nbsp;
9.3588E-06&nbsp; 6.0706E-06&nbsp; 7.1982E-06&nbsp; 1.1318E-05&nbsp; 1.8818E-05<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 3.2732E-05&nbsp; 4.3062E-05&nbsp; 3.2938E-05&nbsp; 1.8867E-05&nbsp; 1.1458E-05&nbsp;
7.2968E-06&nbsp; 7.8073E-06&nbsp; 1.2400E-05&nbsp; 2.2234E-05&nbsp; 4.8802E-05<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 8.0744E-05&nbsp; 4.8871E-05&nbsp; 2.1742E-05&nbsp; 1.2263E-05&nbsp; 7.6456E-06&nbsp;
7.3533E-06&nbsp; 1.1392E-05&nbsp; 1.8975E-05&nbsp; 3.2817E-05&nbsp; 4.3732E-05<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 3.2604E-05&nbsp; 1.9071E-05&nbsp; 1.1172E-05&nbsp; 7.1886E-06&nbsp; 6.3338E-06&nbsp;
9.0320E-06&nbsp; 1.3372E-05&nbsp; 1.8669E-05&nbsp; 2.0860E-05&nbsp; 1.8591E-05<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.3316E-05&nbsp; 9.1300E-06&nbsp; 6.4121E-06&nbsp; 5.2601E-06&nbsp; 7.0427E-06&nbsp;
9.0760E-06&nbsp; 1.1276E-05&nbsp; 1.1949E-05&nbsp; 1.0938E-05&nbsp; 9.3113E-06<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 6.9504E-06&nbsp; 5.2326E-06&nbsp; 4.1439E-06&nbsp; 5.3743E-06&nbsp; 6.1863E-06&nbsp;
7.0768E-06&nbsp; 7.4555E-06&nbsp; 7.0991E-06&nbsp; 6.3421E-06&nbsp; 5.1644E-06<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 4.1256E-06<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Percentage errors follow in a matrix A(ix,iy,iz), format
(1(5x,1p,10(1x,e11.4)))<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.2964E+00&nbsp; 1.6554E+00&nbsp; 1.6183E+00&nbsp; 1.2396E+00&nbsp; 1.7084E+00&nbsp;
1.4425E+00&nbsp; 1.8012E+00&nbsp; 1.9117E+00&nbsp; 2.0120E+00&nbsp; 1.0476E+00<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.3214E+00&nbsp; 1.6861E+00&nbsp; 7.5966E-01&nbsp; 8.8235E-01&nbsp; 1.2887E+00&nbsp;
1.2867E+00&nbsp; 1.5561E+00&nbsp; 1.8029E+00&nbsp; 1.5129E+00&nbsp; 9.5464E-01<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 9.7567E-01&nbsp; 9.8942E-01&nbsp; 7.1862E-01&nbsp; 1.4051E+00&nbsp; 1.2920E+00&nbsp;
9.1504E-01&nbsp; 1.7898E+00&nbsp; 1.2718E+00&nbsp; 1.0728E+00&nbsp; 1.2945E+00<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 8.4007E-01&nbsp; 4.0738E-01&nbsp; 7.4852E-01&nbsp; 1.0894E+00&nbsp; 1.2322E+00&nbsp;
1.2961E+00&nbsp; 1.7421E+00&nbsp; 1.4518E+00&nbsp; 6.7243E-01&nbsp; 4.4831E-01<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 5.5289E-01&nbsp; 5.1126E-01&nbsp; 6.5050E-01&nbsp; 8.1552E-01&nbsp; 1.4150E+00&nbsp;
7.6730E-01&nbsp; 1.1712E+00&nbsp; 9.0391E-01&nbsp; 5.7001E-01&nbsp; 6.3703E-01<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 6.6893E-01&nbsp; 1.0929E+00&nbsp; 4.7263E-01&nbsp; 9.7158E-01&nbsp; 1.4058E+00&nbsp;
9.7550E-01&nbsp; 8.3666E-01&nbsp; 9.6425E-01&nbsp; 9.5974E-01&nbsp; 1.0777E+00<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.1423E+00&nbsp; 1.1156E+00&nbsp; 1.4287E+00&nbsp; 1.4051E+00&nbsp; 1.4547E+00&nbsp;
1.5493E+00&nbsp; 1.3439E+00&nbsp; 1.5610E+00&nbsp; 7.8682E-01&nbsp; 1.1736E+00<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 1.6611E+00&nbsp; 1.9968E+00&nbsp; 1.9193E+00&nbsp; 2.2169E+00&nbsp; 1.6782E+00&nbsp;
1.2294E+00&nbsp; 1.6989E+00&nbsp; 2.0874E+00&nbsp; 8.2612E-01&nbsp; 1.8507E+00<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; 2.0287E+00<br>
<br>
> From the results, we can find the large difference with Figure 1 at
web. Why the difference exist for two results?<br>
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; On the other hand, I use the results from Figure 1 to calculate the
dose rate of First dosemeter:<br>
the maximum value in Figure 1 is about&nbsp; 3.2432E-5 GeV/cm^3;<br>
the factor to coverse to Gy unit: 1</span></span><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">.6E-7/<span>2.64;<br>
the number of electrons for 1 mA is about 6.24E15 e/s;<br>
the pressure ratio&nbsp; of&nbsp;</span></span></span><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">atmospheric</span></span><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;"><span>&nbsp;
pressure&nbsp; to&nbsp;</span></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">the
operating pressure of the machine (133.0 nPa = 10<sup>&#8211;9</sup>torr) is
about 7.59E11;<br>
So the dose rate in uGy/mA is</span></span><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: courier; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">3.2432E-5
*</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: courier; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">(1</span></span><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">.6E-7/<span>2.64)
*</span></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;"><span>6.24E15
* 10E6 /</span></span></span><span class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">7.59E11
= 0.0159436 uGy/mA;<br>
But the results in TABLE 3 in NIMB 88(1994) 345 is 1510</span></span><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: sans-serif; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;">uGy/mA,
what is wrong with my calculated results?<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp; Thank you very much !<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
Hantao Jing<br>
&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;&nbsp;
2011-5-2<br>
</span></span><span class="Apple-style-span"
  style="border-collapse: separate; color: rgb(0, 0, 0); font-family: 'Times New Roman'; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; letter-spacing: normal; line-height: normal; orphans: 2; text-indent: 0px; text-transform: none; white-space: normal; widows: 2; word-spacing: 0px; font-size: medium;"><span
  class="Apple-style-span"
  style="color: rgb(64, 64, 64); font-family: courier; font-size: 16px; text-align: justify;"><br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
<br>
</span></span>
</body>
</html>

--------------070707070002070400060603--
Received on Mon May 02 2011 - 14:54:52 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 02 2011 - 14:55:01 CEST