[fluka-discuss]: RE: NRT standard DPA

From: <tristan.davenne_at_stfc.ac.uk>
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2014 10:26:47 +0000

Dear Alberto, Thankyou for pointing me at this useful article.

I understand the FLUKA implementation gives a more accurate representation of dpa, however some of my colleagues would like to know what the NRT value of dpa is. Can I obtain the NRT value of dpa by setting the transport energy threshold to a high value (say at the level of my incident beam energy)?

Would i have to set the threshold kinetic energy for elastic, inelastic and star reactions (what (3), what(4) and what(6) in the threshold card

Kind Regards


-----Original Message-----
From: Fasso, Alberto [mailto:fasso_at_slac.stanford.edu]
Sent: 25 January 2014 10:49
To: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Cc: Davenne, Tristan (STFC,RAL,TECH)
Subject: RE: NRT standard DPA

Dear Tristan,

you can find a detailed answer to your question in this article:

From: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it [owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it] On Behalf Of tristan.davenne_at_stfc.ac.uk [tristan.davenne_at_stfc.ac.uk]
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2014 12:23 AM
To: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Subject: [fluka-discuss]: NRD standard DPA

Dear FLuka Experts,

How does the calculation of displacements per atom in Fluka compare to the NRT standard method for calculating dpa?

Many tHanks


Tristan Davenne

STFC Technology
G19 R65
Rutherford Appleton Laboratory
Chilton, Didcot, Oxfordshire OX11 0QX, UK
Tel: +44 (0)1235 445485
Email: tristan.davenne_at_stfc.ac.uk<mailto:t.r.davenne_at_rl.ac.uk>

Scanned by iCritical.
Scanned by iCritical.
Received on Tue Jan 28 2014 - 13:04:06 CET

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jan 28 2014 - 13:04:07 CET