Re: [fluka-discuss]: the activity of residual simulated is not satisfied with the actual activity

From: paola sala <paola.sala_at_cern.ch>
Date: Thu, 30 Oct 2014 15:29:15 +0100

Dear Jianqui
could you, please, explain in more detail what is
"the consequence acquired by paper" and what is the difference with
simulation?
At a first check, I see no problem in your input, except for the fact
that the geometry is defined with many RCC having some of the surfaces
in common. This could cause some rounding errors, but should not be a
major problem. Maybe I'm missing something.
Regards
Paola
On 10/30/2014 01:37 PM, 陈建琪 wrote:
> Dear fluka experts
> Recently I used fluka to simulate the activity of residual. I
> found that the results was lower than the consequence acquired by
> paper, especially the activity value of medium nuclide. I didn't know
> what parameter I set was wrong. So I attached my input card in
> attatchment to seek help from you! Thank you in advance!
>
> Best regards
> !
> ; Jianqi Chen
>
>
>
Received on Thu Oct 30 2014 - 16:39:37 CET