Luigi,
Thanks, I know. I have to use SPHs for some reason. We have to find the
cause.
Best wishes,
Vadim
On Apr 30, 2015 2:52 AM, "Luigi Salvatore Esposito" <
luigi.salvatore.esposito_at_cern.ch> wrote:
> Vadim,
> likely the artefact is due to your geometry definition.
> Instead of using SPHs to cut the RCC try to use infinite planes XYP.
> Cheers,
>
> Luigi
>
>
> > On 30 Apr 2015, at 09:03, Vadim Moskvin <vadim.p.moskvin_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Dear Authors and Colleagues,
> >
> > I have noticed a strange difference between DOSE and Energy deposition
> (please see figures in the attachment). If the DOSE was calculating as
> deposition from energy in a given bin accounting on a density of the
> material where this deposition was and then after all, during the
> post-processing, we divide on the bin volume, then we should not have this
> artifact. Please advase what went wrong. It seems like the division on the
> mass density were moved to post-processing (I had never seen this artifact
> before). It could be that something went wrong in my coding...I will
> appreciate your suggestion from fresh view on files.
> >
> > Thank you,
> >
> > Vadim
> > <EX1.flair><EX1.inp><EX1_22_plot.jpg><EX1_24_plot.jpg>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Thu Apr 30 2015 - 11:11:10 CEST