From: Joseph Comfort (Joseph.Comfort@asu.edu)
Date: Tue Apr 17 2007 - 23:23:22 CEST
Hi Alfredo,
Sorry, our eyes seem to differ. The dip near bin 72 (19.6 MeV) is
partly filled in by the red distribution, and may be a better
representation of the physics you mention. The red distribution
completely wipes out the kink (dip) near bin 92 (~400 MeV neutron
kinetic energy). The only difference between the two cases is the
PEATHRESH card. If I had included this card at the beginning, I would
never have had a cause for concern. I need to parameterize a function
to fit the distribution, and the kinks I saw were not helping. As always,
Best regards.
Joe
-- Joseph Comfort Phone: (480)-965-6377 Department of Physics & Astronomy Dept.: (480)-965-3561 Arizona State University Fax: (480)-965-7954 Tempe, AZ 85287-1504 Email: Joseph.Comfort@asu.edu
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Tue Apr 17 2007 - 23:38:09 CEST