Re: Source definition

• Previous message: Stefan Roesler: "Re: The FLUKA result is just 10 times lower than analytic one?"
• In reply to: Shlomo Mark: "Source definition"
• Next in thread: Sebastien WURTH: "Re: Source definition"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

Hello Shlomo,

Since you are rather quick in the description you made, I can only
assume I understood it properly.
If by "plate" you mean "linear", ie a 1-D source, I suggest that you
take a look a the fluka manual, in user routines chapter, to the source
dedicated part.
It is explained how to sample a source from an uniform distribution.

Hope it helps.
Regards.
Sebastien.

Shlomo Mark wrote :

>Shalom
>
>I want to use the FLUKA to calculate the dose when my source is plate
>from nuclear fission can you suggest me what is the best way to define the
>source?
>
>Tnx again
>
>Shlomo mark
>
>
>***********************************************
>
>Shlomo Mark, Ph.D.
>
>Negev Monte Carlo research Center
>
>Software Engineering Dep.
>
>Shamoon College of Engineering - SCE
>
>http:\nmcrc.sce.ac.il
>
>P.O.B 950 Beer Sheva 84100, ISRAEL
>
>Phone: + 972 - 8 - 6475631
>
>*******************************
>
>
>

• Previous message: Stefan Roesler: "Re: The FLUKA result is just 10 times lower than analytic one?"
• In reply to: Shlomo Mark: "Source definition"
• Next in thread: Sebastien WURTH: "Re: Source definition"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Jun 08 2007 - 09:37:14 CEST