Dear Masoomeh,
The relation that you show in the png yields x_0 = 44.85 cm, not 103. But maybe I have misunderstood something ?
Cheers
Philippe
From: owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it [mailto:owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it] On Behalf Of Masoomeh Yarmohammadi Satri
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2017 3:06 PM
To: fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Subject: [fluka-discuss]: Fluka run and calculation comparision
Dear All,
I exposed a two layers: Titanium-copper target with a 10MeV electron beam and read the Dose equivalent data at 1m from the target before a 30cm Concrete wall and after the wall. For a cross check, I used the D2=D1 exp (-ux/p) and implemented the D2 (Dose EQ after the 30cm concrete wall) and D1 (Dose EQ before the wall) from the fluka run data (file is attached as a png). I was expecting the x=30 cm but solving the relation for x gave x=103cm concrete thickness. Could you please let me know why this big difference between the relation and simulation while data of simulation is extracted from 30cm concrete wall thickness?
Best regards,
Masoomeh
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Wed Jun 14 2017 - 11:57:37 CEST