From: Bertini Dr. Denis (D.Bertini@gsi.de)
Date: Fri Dec 07 2007 - 11:44:33 CET
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------_=_NextPart_001_01C838BE.273C6F52
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Dear User,
I am comparing results for Energy deposition in Fluka and Geant3 for
thin layer of Silicon ( typically 400 micrometer ).
I found out that Fluka results ( using USRBIN ) give systematically
20% to 30% lower energy loss in Silicon that Geant3.
I use the recommended algorithm for the energy loss calculation
(apportioning track length algorithm ).
May some specific settings have to be included in my input file
in order to cope with thin layer.=20
Any help is welcome !=20
thanks in advance.=20
Denis Bertini
=20
------_=_NextPart_001_01C838BE.273C6F52
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 3.2//EN">
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<META HTTP-EQUIV=3D"Content-Type" CONTENT=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META NAME=3D"Generator" CONTENT=3D"MS Exchange Server version =
6.5.7638.1">
<TITLE>Energy deposition on thin layer of Silicon</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<!-- Converted from text/plain format -->
<BR>
<P><FONT SIZE=3D2>Dear User,<BR>
I am comparing results for Energy deposition in Fluka and Geant3 for<BR>
thin layer of Silicon ( typically 400 micrometer ).<BR>
I found out that Fluka results ( using USRBIN ) give systematically<BR>
20% to 30% lower energy loss in Silicon that Geant3.<BR>
I use the recommended algorithm for the energy loss calculation<BR>
(apportioning track length algorithm ).<BR>
May some specific settings have to be included in my input =
file<BR>
in order to cope with thin layer.<BR>
Any help is welcome !<BR>
&=
nbsp; &n=
bsp; thanks in =
advance.<BR>
&=
nbsp; &n=
bsp; =
Denis Bertini<BR>
&=
nbsp; &n=
bsp; =
</FONT>
</P>
</BODY>
</HTML>
------_=_NextPart_001_01C838BE.273C6F52--
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Fri Dec 07 2007 - 13:12:40 CET