Dear Alice,
it would be useful if you could send me your input file.
In any case, may I ask you which type of RADDECAY do you set?
(semi-analogue or activation study, value of what(1)).
And: do you associate a DCYSCORE to your scorings?
Regards
Paola
> Dear all,
>
> I am running a simulation of muons doing spallation in water, I am using
> RESNUCLEI card to check isotopes produced and REDDECAY to check their
> decay products. I found that the isotope yield is pretty reasonable and
> the energy spectra of the decay products too, however, not all my
> isotopes are decaying, meaning that the number of isotopes is always
> greater than the number of decays. I notice also that this is not
> uniform for different type of isotopes (for example only 22% of 16N do
> decay, 44% for 18N, 75 %17N, 81% for 15C, while for other like 8He or
> 8Li, 12B, 13O, 12C ... is more than 95%). Moreover i checked that is not
> related to the geometry of my simulation nor the thresholds I put. Does
> anyone know if I am missing something in the physics or in the
> simulation? Any comment would be appreciated.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Best,
>
> Alice
>
> __________________________________________________________________________
> You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
> https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
>
Paola Sala
INFN Milano
tel. Milano +39-0250317374
tel. CERN +41-227679148
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Fri Feb 14 2020 - 12:11:06 CET