Hello
The geometry looks fine, I cannot judge on biasing not knowing the factors
you used. However: what is the weight assigned to the green regions in
your plots? And to outside air?
Could you please explain what do you mean by "results a factor 1000
higher than expected"?
Thanks
Paola
On Tue, 28 Apr 2020, Raksha Rajput wrote:
> Dear Experts
>
> Please find attached the geometry cross-section.
> 1. RCC (A10) is cut by planes to divide it into regions, for Biasing (surface-splitting, increasing no. of photons per region)
> 2. RCC(A14) is also cut by same planes (as these are infinite), to divide for biasing. Is this the correct way ? OR, it should be done by making concentric RCCS as is done for RCC(A7). A10 & A14 for Axial points (Top of the shield).
> 3. RCC(A7) is divided into regions by making concentric RCCs - to calculate the dose rates in radial points.
> Kindly suggest whether the regions are divided correctly.
> Or, please suggest corrections.
> The results I am getting are higher(by a factor of 1000) than expected.
>
> Thanks in advance.
> Regards,
> Raksha.
>
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Wed May 06 2020 - 18:38:18 CEST