RE:[fluka-discuss]: Differences between RULL and ETRACK in mgdraw

From: Ricardo Manuel Dos Santos Augusto <r.s.augusto_at_cern.ch>
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2020 16:33:49 +0000

Dear Alessandro,

Your assessment of the RULL variable is correct but ETRACK refers to total energy (rest+kinetic) hence the discrepancy. In fact, the ETRACK value should be in excess of 3.7 GeV.

Best regards,
Ricardo

//Ricardo dos Santos Augusto
TRIUMF-EH&S
Office: +1 604 222 10 47 (6375)
4004 Wesbrook Mall,
Vancouver, BC V6T 2A3, Canada//
________________________________________
De : owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it [owner-fluka-discuss_at_mi.infn.it] de la part de Alessandro Calamida [alex.calamida2_at_tiscalinet.it]
Envoyé : mercredi 22 juillet 2020 13:15
À : fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Objet : [fluka-discuss]: Differences between RULL and ETRACK in mgdraw

Dear FLUKA experts,

I have a doubt, what is the difference between the RULL variable and the
ETRACK one in the ENDRAW entry of the mgdraw subroutine. I read from the
manual that RULL is the energy deposited in a region at the stop of the
particle, instead, the second is the energy of the particle in the
track. But, why there is a difference a 10^3 between them? For example,
I have He^4 ions of 3.5 MeV energy. When I record the RULL variable, it
gives to me the results of 0.0035 GeV as exptected, but when I use the
ETRACK I have 3.5 GeV.

Beat regards and thanks for your time, Alessandro Calamida.


--
Questa e-mail è stata controllata per individuare virus con Avast antivirus.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Wed Jul 22 2020 - 20:27:23 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Wed Jul 22 2020 - 20:27:25 CEST