Dear Anna
Thanks for your report. Indeed there was a problem when AA collisions were
performed in inverse kinematics (like 238U on C) setting a threshold for
the interaction model much higher than what it should have been.
In your example this has no consequence for 58Ni but it spoils 238U.
A fix is already ready and it will be released in a respin tomorrow at
most, together with a few other fixes/improvements.
Thanks again
Alfredo
P.S. The Flair default for heavy ion should be changed, the DPMJET card is
useless, and the default should be better be PRECISIO, we will change it
> Dear FLUKA experts.
> My colleague repeated her calculations with new FLUKA release September
> 2023. She found some inconsistency with previous results (see first page
> of the pdf file). I tried to investigate this issue, and found, that heavy
> ions passing through thick target almost without interaction (second
> page). I put the input, which I used for this study. I used November 2023
> FLUKA version.
>
> Could you please check, that this is valid issue, and correct it?
>
> Best regards
> Anna
>
>
> PS.
> Input was generated as FLAIR default input for heavy ion beams.
> ______________________________________
>
> Dr. Anna Senger
>
> Office KBW 2.01
> Tel. +49(0)615971 1844
> E-Mail A.Senger_at_gsi.de
>
> FAIR - Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research in Europe GmbH
> �
> Planckstr. 1
> 64291 Darmstadt
> DEUTSCHLAND
>
>
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Wed Jan 31 2024 - 20:40:54 CET