Re: about AUXSCORE

From: <Andrea.Mairani_at_mi.infn.it>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 17:06:03 +0200 (CEST)

Dear Hantao,
I've checked your simulation and I've looked at the .out file and it's
clearly written:
!!!!! Generalized particle n. 211(EM-ENRGY) cannot be used with the
AUXSCORE card, ignored !!!!!
For electrons and positrons I suggest you to use:
E+&E- 213 Electrons and positrons
And for photons:
PHOTON 7
AND I suggest you to read a very useful comment by Alberto Fasso' on the
argument:
http://www.fluka.org/web_archive/earchive/new-fluka-discuss/2362.html

Ciao
Andrea

> Dear fluka experts,
> I want to obtain the dose equivalents from the all particles
> (ALL-PART), Neutron(NEUTRON), and Electromagnetic energy(EM-ENRGY)
> around the Iron beam stop. So I use the following card:
> USRBIN 10.0 240.0 57.0 800.0 800.0 800.0TEDepoit3
>
> USRBIN -800.0 -800.0 -800.0 80.0 80.0 80.0&
>
> AUXSCORE USRBIN ALL-PART TEDepoit3 TEDepoit3 1.0AMB74
>
> *
>
>
> USRBIN 10.0 240.0 58.0 800.0 800.0 800.0TEDepoit4
>
> USRBIN -800.0 -800.0 -800.0 80.0 80.0 80.0&
>
> AUXSCORE USRBIN NEUTRON TEDepoit4 TEDepoit4 1.0AMB74
>
> *
>
>
> USRBIN 10.0 240.0 59.0 800.0 800.0 800.0TEDepoit5
>
> USRBIN -800.0 -800.0 -800.0 80.0 80.0 80.0&
>
> AUXSCORE USRBIN EM-ENRGY TEDepoit5 TEDepoit5 1.0AMB74
>
> *.
>
> To my surprise, I find the results from ALL-PART and EM-ENRGY are
> completely same. I don't know why? How to obtain the Electromagnetic
> dose-equivalent(of electrons, positrons or photons)?
> The NEUTRON result is smaller than the ALL-PART result, I think it
> is reasonable. The input file already attached in attachment.
> Thank you very much!
>
> Hantao Jing
> 2009-9-7
>
Received on Mon Sep 07 2009 - 17:51:06 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Sep 07 2009 - 17:51:06 CEST