Re: Mismatch of coordinates in the ENDRAW entry and the TRACKR common

From: Vassili Maroussov <>
Date: Tue, 27 Apr 2010 14:28:22 +0200

Dear Alberto,

then how can I get out the time of energy deposition? Actually in 99.9%
cases (It was a misprint, not in 99%) the (XSCO, YSCO, ZSCO) point
coincides with the(XTRACK(1),YTRACK(1),ZTRACK(1)) point in the TRACKR
common, so I assumed the ATRACK of TRACKR gives me the time - and this
output is looking extremely reasonable... What is a correct way to find
the timing for each energy deposition?



On 04/27/2010 02:20 PM, Alberto Fasso' wrote:
> Dear Vassili,
> the variables in the TRACKR COMMON refer to particle tracks (as the name
> suggests), not to particles at rest.
> In the ENDRAW ENTRY, all the useful quantities (region, position,
> quantity
> to be deposited) are made available via the CALL arguments.
> Alberto
> On Tue, 27 Apr 2010, Vassili Maroussov wrote:
>> Dear FLUKA experts,
>> I've found that for ~1% energy depositions obtained by the ENDRAW entry
>> of MGDRAW the coordinates (XSCO, YSCO, ZSCO) do not coincides with ones
>> in the TRACKR common; neither with XTRACK(0),YTRACK(0),ZTRACK(0) nor
>> XTRACK(1),YTRACK(1),ZTRACK(1). All these cases corresponds to ICODE=22:
>> EMFSCO, below threshold, iarg=2 (BTW, what the iarg means?). What is a
>> reason for that?
>> Regards,
>> Vassili
Received on Tue Apr 27 2010 - 21:38:55 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Apr 27 2010 - 21:38:55 CEST