Re: Particle numbers 53 and 59

Hi Paul,

you are right: there was a typo. It will be corrected in the new version of the
manual.
Notice that the correct particle number is printed in the standard xxx.out file

Alberto

On Sun, 25 Sep 2011, Santana, Mario wrote:

> Paul,
>
> I checked in http://pdg.lbl.gov/2002/montecarlorpp.pdf and verified what you state. Moreover, the two particles should have the same ABS(PDG#) given the fact one is the anti particle of the other. Therefore, I think that you are right, there is probably a typo in the manual, the third '1' in 4112 should be a '3'. Alberto???
>
> Mario
>
>
> On Sep 25, 2011, at 10:37 AM, Paul Miyagawa wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I was comparing the particle numbers for Fluka and PDG and found something which I don't quite understand. Fluka particles 53 and 59
>> are described as "Xi_c-zero" and "AntiXi_c-zero" respectively, but their PDG numbers are listed as 4112 and -4132. PDG 4112 is a
>> Sigma_c-zero; moreover there are no other Sigma particles listed in Fluka. Should 4112 actually be 4132?
>>
>> http://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=man_onl&sub=7
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Paul
Received on Mon Sep 26 2011 - 22:16:30 CEST