Dear Ertan
your cards are completely meaningless!! Where did you get from????
Read the manual, don't kill neutrons, don't use leading particle biasing
in the EM part, put reasonable thresholds for EM particles, ,
follow the release notes for the PHYSICS cards, and then come back if you
don't find the results you expect.
In general for a calorimeter like run all biasing should be off of course,
no particle should be killed etc etc. Putting cards at random will never
give you a meaningful result.
Alfredo
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Alfredo Ferrari || Tel.: +41.22.76.76119 |
| CERN-EN/STI || Fax.: +41.22.76.69474 |
| 1211 Geneva 23 || e-mail: Alfredo.Ferrari_at_cern.ch |
| Switzerland || |
+----------------------------------------------------------------------+
On Mon, 9 Apr 2012, Ertan Arikan wrote:
> Dear Fluka experts,
>
> I study about the hadronic-tile calorimeter=2E Energy resolution results
> (I have obtained by using fluka (2011 version) ) are 2 times higher
> than GEANT4-results
>
> Somebody used the fluka-2006 version for the energy resolution of
> hadronic-tile calorimeter
>
> Question
> 1) Why the energy resolution results are 2 times higher than GEANT4-results
>
> 2) Which physics card I should use in fluka-2011-version or
> I try to find the fluka-2006 version.
> How can I find fluka-2006 version?
>
> ------- some CARDs in my input-----
> GLOBAL 10000. -1. 0.0 0.0 1.
> DEFAULTS CALORIME
> BEAM -200. 10.PION-
> PHYSICS 3. 1000. 1000. 1000. 1000. 1000. EVAPORAT
> PHYSICS 1000. 1000. 1000. 1000. 1000. 1000.PEATHRES
> PHYSICS 2. 1000. 1000. 3-HELIUM @LASTPAR 1.DECAYS
> LOW-BIAS 26. 261. 0.85 reg1 @LASTREG 1.
> EMFCUT 0.001 0.0004 204. reg1 @LASTREG 1.
> -----------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks for your help
>
> Ertan Arkan
>
Received on Mon Apr 09 2012 - 18:58:30 CEST
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Apr 09 2012 - 18:58:30 CEST