[fluka-discuss]: Dose in Vacuum using USRBIN DOSE-EQ?

From: Cillian Murphy <cillian.murphy.1_at_ucdconnect.ie>
Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 18:29:38 +0200

Dear Fluka experts,

My name is Cillian Murphy,
I'm doing radiation shielding simulations at EAC, Cologne for my Masters
research.

I've noticed something odd about some of my results using USRBIN. I'm
plotting DOSE, ENERGY, and DOSE-EQ for a large rectangular space around my
target region. I'm simulating protons, neutrons and heavy ions from GCR,
Solar wind and SPEs. The strange thing that I've noticed is that DOSE-EQ
gives a distinctly non-zero value for deposition in the vacuum surrounding
the target region, surely as with DOSE this result should be 0 everywhere
in vacuum?

One other thing that I've noticed and am curious about though I don't think
it's wrong is that DOSE and DOSE-EQ do not produce directly comparable
results (aside from the odd deposition in vacuum), the results are of very
similar order and are very similar to look at, however they do not match as
well as I had initially expected though I now suspect that this is due to
differing radiation weighting factors for the secondaries. I feel it's
better to be safe than sorry so I thought I'd confirm this while I'm
writing anyway.

I hope that you can explain these details for me or point out where I'm
going wrong.
I'll attach one of the odd outputs as well as including my most recent
.inp. I'm using Flair in case that could somehow be responsible. This is
also a WIP I've only just started producing meaningful results after
struggling for some time to get FLUKA working properly, I'll be refining
most aspects of the simulation over several iterations.

Thank you for your time,
Cillian


investigate.inp:

TITLE Habitat Shield Simulation

* Set the defaults for precision simulations
DEFAULTS
 PRECISIO
GEOBEGIN
 COMBNAME
    0 0
SPH BLKHLBND 0.0 0.0 0.0 100000.
SPH SIMLNSPH 0.0 0.0 0.0 10000.
RCC HABWLOUT 0.0 -250.0 0.0 0.0 500. 0.0 550.
RCC HABWLLIN 0.0 -250.0 0.0 0.0 500.0 0.0 500.
XYP PLNDIVDR 0.0
SPH TSTSPHR1 160. 0.0 300.0 50.
SPH TSTSPHR2 300.0 0.0 -250. 50.
SPH TSTSPHR3 -400.0 0.0 200. 50.
SPH TSTSPHR4 -180.0 0.0 -400.0 50.
XZP TSTBNDY1 250.0
XZP TSTBNDY2 -250.0
SPH TSTSPHR5 0.0 0.0 0.0 50.
XYP SURFLINE 0.0
SPH LUNARBND 0.0 0.0 0.0 5000.0
END
BOUNDARY 5 -BLKHLBND
VACUUMAR 5 +BLKHLBND -(+HABWLOUT +TSTBNDY1 -TSTBNDY2) -(-HABWLOUT
-SURFLINE +TSTBNDY1 -TSTBNDY2 +LUNARBND )
HABSHILD 5 +HABWLOUT -HABWLLIN
HABATMSP 5 +HABWLLIN -TSTSPHR1 -TSTSPHR2 -TSTSPHR3 -TSTSPHR4 -TSTSPHR5
TSTSPHR1 5 +TSTSPHR1
TSTSPHR2 5 +TSTSPHR2
TSTSPHR3 5 +TSTSPHR3
TSTSPHR4 5 +TSTSPHR4
TSTSPHR5 5 +TSTSPHR5
LUNRSURF 5 -HABWLOUT -SURFLINE +TSTBNDY1 -TSTBNDY2 +LUNARBND
END
GEOEND
*BEAM -0.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
 PROTON
BEAM -0.02 0.0 0.0 1500.0 600.0 1.0PROTON
BEAMPOS 0.0 0.0 -1000.0
* SiO2 (quartz)
* The density of SiO2 may vary from 2.3 - 2.5 g/cm3 depending on the
* method of preparation. Under ion bombardment, the surface density
* will change towards an equilibrium value of about 2.37.
MATERIAL 2.32 SiO2
COMPOUND 2.0 OXYGEN 1.0 SILICON SiO2
* Titanium dioxide Ti_O2
*
MATERIAL 4.26 TiO2
COMPOUND -0.400592 OXYGEN -0.599408 TITANIUM TiO2
* Aluminum Oxide (alpha)
* The density of aluminum oxide will vary by 5% according to the
* method of preparation.
MATERIAL 3.98 Al2O3
COMPOUND 2.0 ALUMINUM 3.0 OXYGEN Al2O3
* Ferric oxide Fe2_O3
*
MATERIAL 5.2 Fe2O3
COMPOUND -0.300567 OXYGEN -0.699433 IRON Fe2O3
* Ferrous oxide Fe_O
*
MATERIAL 5.7 FeO
COMPOUND -0.222689 OXYGEN -0.777311 IRON FeO
MATERIAL 25. 7.21
 MANGANES
* Manganese Oxide (MnO)
* Material added by Cillian Murphy 08/06/16 to define lunar regolith
simulant materials for radiation shielding simulations.
MATERIAL 5.43
 MANGOXID
COMPOUND 1.0 MANGANES 1.0 OXYGEN
 MANGOXID
* MgO (Magnesia)
* Material added by Cillian Murphy 08/06/16 to define lunar regolith
simulant materials for radiation shielding simulations.
MATERIAL 3.58
 MAGNESIA
COMPOUND 1.0 MAGNESIU 1.0 OXYGEN
 MAGNESIA
* Calcium oxide Ca_O
*
MATERIAL 3.3 CaO
COMPOUND -0.285299 OXYGEN -0.714701 CALCIUM CaO
* Sodium monoxide Na2_O
*
MATERIAL 2.27 Na2O
COMPOUND -0.258143 OXYGEN -0.741857 SODIUM Na2O
MATERIAL 19. 0.862
 POTASSIU
* Potassium oxide K2_O
*
MATERIAL 2.32 K2O
COMPOUND -0.169852 OXYGEN -0.830148 POTASSIU K2O
MATERIAL 15. 1.82
 PHOSPHO
* P2O5 (Phosphorus Pentoxide)
*
MATERIAL 2.39
 PHOSPNTO
COMPOUND 2.0 PHOSPHO 5.0 OXYGEN
 PHOSPNTO
MATERIAL 1.98 JSC1A
COMPOUND -42.95 SiO2 -1.57 TiO2 -14.53 Al2O3JSC1A
COMPOUND -11.5 Fe2O3 -7.52 FeO -0.17 MANGOXIDJSC1A
COMPOUND -8.64 MAGNESIA -9.11 CaO -2.6 Na2OJSC1A
COMPOUND -0.71 K2O -0.65 PHOSPNTO JSC1A
ASSIGNMA BLCKHOLE BOUNDARY
ASSIGNMA VACUUM VACUUMAR
ASSIGNMA JSC1A HABSHILD
ASSIGNMA AIR HABATMSP
ASSIGNMA WATER TSTSPHR1
ASSIGNMA WATER TSTSPHR2
ASSIGNMA WATER TSTSPHR3
ASSIGNMA WATER TSTSPHR4
ASSIGNMA WATER TSTSPHR5
ASSIGNMA JSC1A LUNRSURF
USRBIN 10. DOSE -21. 1000.0 300.0
 1000.0BXBLKDOS
USRBIN -1000.0 -300.0 -1000.0 255. 255. 255. &
USRBIN 10. ENERGY -22. 1000.0 300.0
 1000.0BXBLKENG
USRBIN -1000.0 -300.0 -1000.0 255. 255. 255. &
USRBIN 10. DOSE-EQ -23. 1000.0 300.0
 1000.0BXBLKDEQ
USRBIN -1000.0 -300.0 -1000.0 255. 255. 255. &
* Set the random number seed
RANDOMIZ 1.0
* Set the number of primary histories to be simulated in the run
START 1000000.
STOP



__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info

9p8MeV_DoseEQ.png
(image/png attachment: 9p8MeV_DoseEQ.png)

Received on Tue Jul 26 2016 - 20:10:53 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Tue Jul 26 2016 - 20:10:56 CEST