Dear All,
two recent bugs found that could lead to a mismatch of how your input is interpreted in flair and in fluka.
1. LOW-MAT
if you used a LOW-MAT with the default values for a material and the default FLUKA name,
flair was creating a card like
LOW-MAT BERYLLIU
with all other whats empty. However if you modified the LOW-MAT, which is the reason one should add
a LOW-MAT card, to assign the proper material or a different name
then the result was ok.
2. DCYTIMES
if you used multiple DCYTIMES cards and in some of them you didn't had declared all 6 WHAT.
Fortran is interpreting the empty whats as zero and adds an additional cooling time at the end of
the irradiation. However flair was ignoring the empty whats and on the next card it would lead to
a mismatch on the cooling index.
e.g. if I have two cards
DCYTIMES 1.0 10.0
DCYTIMES 200.0 2000.0
DCYTIMES 30000.0
fluka will interpret it as
index 1 = 1.0 s
2= 10.0 s
3 = 0.0 s
4 = 200.0 s
5 = 2000.0 s
6 = 30000.0 s
while flair would have missed the index #3
However the output summary files from the detectors should indicate the correct cooling time.
Both bugs are corrected in the current version on the web
Vasilis
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Tue Sep 20 2016 - 11:37:04 CEST