Re: FLUKA: USRBDX results and running speed


To "Stefan Roesler" <sroesler@SLAC.Stanford.EDU>, "Alberto Fasso'" <fasso@SLAC.Stanford.EDU>
From Fan Lei <flei@scs.dera.gov.uk>
Date Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:25:48 +0100
Cc "fluka" <fluka-discuss@listbox.cern.ch>
References <Pine.SOL.4.33.0104051403080.22770-100000@flora06.SLAC.Stanford.EDU >
Reply-To "Fan Lei" <flei@scs.dera.gov.uk>
Sender owner-fluka-discuss@listbox.cern.ch

>
> I just had a quick look into your input. Your beam momentum is 1GeV/c;
> therefore the maximum kinetic energy a neutron can have is only about
> 0.43GeV. In contrast to what you wrote you have defined the inner shell
> (region 3) to be Aluminum and the outer Tungsten (region 4). Furthermore I
> suggest that you use a lower energy limit for the usrbdx-binning which
> coincides with one of the low-energy neutron group boundaries (see
> manual).

Hi Stefan,

Thanks for pointing out the mistakes in my .inp file. This shows that one
realy OUGHT
to read the manual before rushing into any simulations.

An update on the performance:

FLUKA ( ICARUS defaults): 1487 s

   same problem with similar cuts:
MCNPX: 262 s
GCALOR: 32 s

I am a bit surprised on the difference in speed of these codes. Are there
any benchmarks
on these codes available?

Regards.

Fan




The information contained in this e-mail and any subsequent correspondence is 
private and is intended solely for the intended recipient(s). For those other 
than the intended recipient any disclosure, copying, distribution, or any 
action taken or omitted to be taken in reliance on such information is 
prohibited and may be unlawful.


Your name :
Your email :
Subject :
Body :
 

Partial thread listing: