From: Markus Brugger (Markus.Brugger@cern.ch)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2007 - 18:24:09 CEST
Hi Mary,
'102' is triggered by secondaries coming from decaying particles (pion,
phi,...), however not decay products as 'produced' when sampling the
radioactive decay using RADDECAY
'110' in contrary refers to exactly the latter, i.e., all particles
stemming from the radioactive decay
cheers
Markus
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-fluka-discuss@mi.infn.it
> [mailto:owner-fluka-discuss@mi.infn.it] On Behalf Of me@marychin.org
> Sent: 21 August 2007 23:48
> To: fluka-discuss@fluka.org
> Subject: Fwd: icode=102 particle decay secondaries
>
> Hi.
>
> Since last posting I have found calls to ICODE=110 (decay
> products) instead of 102 (particle decay secondaries). What's
> the difference please?
>
> Thanks,
> mary
>
> Forwarded message follows:
> > Hi.
> >
> > If in my output file I see:
> >
> ======================================================================
> > ========== Number of secondaries generated in inelastic
> interactions
> > per beam
> particle:
> > Prompt radiation Radioactive decays
> > 0.0000E+00 (100.%) 3.0001E+00 (100.%)
> > 0.0000E+00 ( 0.0%) 9.9999E-01 (33.3%) ELECTRON
> > 0.0000E+00 ( 0.0%) 9.9999E-01 (33.3%) ANEUTRIE
> > 0.0000E+00 ( 0.0%) 1.0001E+00 (33.3%) PHOTON
> >
> ======================================================================
> > ==========
> >
> > How did it happeen that my usdraw recorded not a single
> ICODE=102 call?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > mary
> >
>
>
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Aug 22 2007 - 18:57:37 CEST