RE: icode=102 particle decay secondaries

From: Markus Brugger (Markus.Brugger@cern.ch)
Date: Wed Aug 22 2007 - 18:24:09 CEST

  • Next message: Markus Brugger: "RE: delayed (n, gamma)"

    Hi Mary,

    '102' is triggered by secondaries coming from decaying particles (pion,
    phi,...), however not decay products as 'produced' when sampling the
    radioactive decay using RADDECAY

    '110' in contrary refers to exactly the latter, i.e., all particles
    stemming from the radioactive decay

    cheers

    Markus

    > -----Original Message-----
    > From: owner-fluka-discuss@mi.infn.it
    > [mailto:owner-fluka-discuss@mi.infn.it] On Behalf Of me@marychin.org
    > Sent: 21 August 2007 23:48
    > To: fluka-discuss@fluka.org
    > Subject: Fwd: icode=102 particle decay secondaries
    >
    > Hi.
    >
    > Since last posting I have found calls to ICODE=110 (decay
    > products) instead of 102 (particle decay secondaries). What's
    > the difference please?
    >
    > Thanks,
    > mary
    >
    > Forwarded message follows:
    > > Hi.
    > >
    > > If in my output file I see:
    > >
    > ======================================================================
    > > ========== Number of secondaries generated in inelastic
    > interactions
    > > per beam
    > particle:
    > > Prompt radiation Radioactive decays
    > > 0.0000E+00 (100.%) 3.0001E+00 (100.%)
    > > 0.0000E+00 ( 0.0%) 9.9999E-01 (33.3%) ELECTRON
    > > 0.0000E+00 ( 0.0%) 9.9999E-01 (33.3%) ANEUTRIE
    > > 0.0000E+00 ( 0.0%) 1.0001E+00 (33.3%) PHOTON
    > >
    > ======================================================================
    > > ==========
    > >
    > > How did it happeen that my usdraw recorded not a single
    > ICODE=102 call?
    > >
    > > Thanks,
    > > mary
    > >
    >
    >
    >


  • Next message: Markus Brugger: "RE: delayed (n, gamma)"

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.6 : Wed Aug 22 2007 - 18:57:37 CEST