Re: [fluka-discuss]: Activation model and EVAPORAT card errors

From: Tamer Tolba <t.tolba_at_fz-juelich.de>
Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2020 15:21:23 +0200

Dear Jürgen,

Excellent! Your modification solved my problem and the code finished
successfully.

Regards,

Tamer

On 4/6/2020 12:07 PM, Jürgen Diefenbach wrote:
> Dear Tamer,
>
> as the error message in the terminal says the function call is missing
> some arguments. Some time ago I edited Layout.py to fix it. The patch
> is attached, generated using "diff originalLayout.py Layout.py >
> Layout.py.diff". If you're not familiar with diff and patch, just look
> at the code and my diff file to see what needs to be done. Make a copy
> of the original Layout.py to avoid messing up things.
>
> I usually also edit "__revision__" in tkFlair.py to make sure I can
> tell for sure if I'm using my patched version or not.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Jürgen
>
>
> On 05.04.20 18:42, Tamer Tolba wrote:
>> Dear all,
>>
>> In my attached simplified test fulka model "InActTest.inp and
>> Act_test.flair", I trying to score the specific activation on a
>> target body. I am following the instructions of exercise 15
>> (Activation). I am also compiling the executable file with linking to
>> "ldpmqmd" as Paola suggested to other use before.
>>
>> I think I followed all instructions in the example model, however I
>> got the following errors:
>>
>> 1- When I try to run with PHYSICS/EVAPORAT card with MODEL set at
>> default "Ignore", I get error _1_errorEvaportCard_Run.png._
>>
>> 2- When I set MODEL to  "New Evap with heavy frag", I get an
>> immediate error on the terminal _2_errorEvaportCard_ActTest.png. _And
>> fluka re-set the MODEL option to "Ignore" automatically!
>>
>> 3- Exercise 15 works fine as it is downloaded from the course
>> website. The option MODEL is set to "New Evap with heavy frag" by
>> default. Now, when I try to change it to "Ignore" (in order to check
>> if I gonna reproduce my test model error) I get the same immediate
>> error on the terminal _3_errorEvaportCard_Ex15.png. _And fluka re-set
>> the MODEL option to "New Evap with heavy frag" automatically!
>>
>> So, it seems that I have no control over the EVAPORT option selection!
>>
>> I am not able to spot the mistake in the Act_test.inp model! And I
>> don't understand why I have no control over the MODEL options of the
>> EVAPORAT card!
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Tamer
>>
>> --
>> Dr. Tamer Tolba
>> Forschungszentrum Jülich
>> Institut für Kernphysik (IKP)
>> 52425 Jülich, Germany
>> Tel.: +49 2461 61 6860
>> Fax.: +49 2461 61 96415
>>
>>
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> Forschungszentrum Juelich GmbH
>> 52425 Juelich
>> Sitz der Gesellschaft: Juelich
>> Eingetragen im Handelsregister des Amtsgerichts Dueren Nr. HR B 3498
>> Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: MinDir Volker Rieke
>> Geschaeftsfuehrung: Prof. Dr.-Ing. Wolfgang Marquardt (Vorsitzender),
>> Karsten Beneke (stellv. Vorsitzender), Prof. Dr.-Ing. Harald Bolt
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>
-- 
Dr. Tamer Tolba
Forschungszentrum Jülich
Institut für Kernphysik (IKP)
52425 Jülich, Germany
Tel.: +49 2461 61 6860
Fax.: +49 2461 61 96415
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Mon Apr 06 2020 - 17:06:29 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Apr 06 2020 - 17:15:33 CEST