[fluka-discuss]: Re: [fluka-discuss]: (无主题)

From: Paola Sala <paola.sala_at_mi.infn.it>
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2020 17:44:05 +0200

Hello
I do not nknoew if I understood correctly your question, so I try with a
tentative answer:

As you say, the monteCarlo gives the statistical average. The result of
the Montecarlo does not depend on the number of histories, only the
statistical erors depend on the number of histories.

In real life, you will have a source, or a beam, with a given (real!)
intensity.

The number of histories in the montecarlo and the intensity of the real
source are not connected.

In general, one should take the averaged montecarlo result and multiply
by the number of photons (or other) from the real source.

Of course, the number of histories isimportant in order to get a good
statistical significance. In addition, if one is looking for a rare
process, and compare with experiment, the number of histories should be
large enough to sample rare events at leas as the experiment will do.

Regards
Paola
> Dear experts I am a Fluka beginner. As we all know, the monte carlo
> algorithm is the sampling average, if I want to irradiate my material with
> a source of photon of 1keV, use 10000 history and score to get the
> statistical average of a per primary  weight, my material is irradiated
> with photons of a total energy of 1000 kev, should I multiply the scoring
> output of 1keV by 1000 to get the total energy of 1000kev? Best ragards!
> Baolong Ji baolong.ji 邮箱:baolong.ji_at_ipp.ac.cn 签名由 网易邮箱大师 定制


Paola Sala
INFN Milano
tel. Milano +39-0250317374
tel. CERN +41-227679148

__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
Received on Mon Aug 03 2020 - 19:24:57 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.0 : Mon Aug 03 2020 - 19:25:03 CEST