Dear Konstantin,
I did not find GLOBAL with SDUM=OLDFLAIR option. I have removed MAT-PROP card at the mean time to compare the results with Geant4 results
I updated the input file you reviewed with my desired material (sim4.inp) attached. It is now running without any errors; however, I am uncertain where to find the final result (a reading in Gy/g along with its statistical uncertainty).
Additionally, I noticed that changing the shape of the beam leads to different results. I'm not sure which configuration is best for a monoenergetic X-ray beam.
One more thing, is there any way to confirm that the mass/volume of the region of interest (C2TARGET) is correctly calculated by FLUKA?
Best regards and Thank you for your assistance
Leena
From: Konstantin Batkov <batkov_at_gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, July 11, 2024 12:27 PM
To: Leena Abdulrahman H B Al-Sulaiti <leena.alsulaiti_at_qu.edu.qa>; fluka-discuss_at_fluka.org
Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [fluka-discuss]: X-ray Dose Simulation for Thin Target
1. When I added the MAT-PROP card to include the ionization value for the compound material, it stopped running, even when this card was disabled.
Oh, that's because of your !_at_what record on line 35. It's obsolete Flair syntax. You need to either remove it or add GLOBAL with SDUM=OLDFLAIR.
Konstantin
__________________________________________________________________________
You can manage unsubscription from this mailing list at
https://www.fluka.org/fluka.php?id=acc_info
- application/octet-stream attachment: sim4.inp
Received on Sat Jul 27 2024 - 11:54:36 CEST