Re: problem with scoring at a given cooling time, using IRRPROFI

From: Stefan Roesler <>
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 17:42:15 +0200

Dear Francesca

As follow up of your posting on July 29 I'd like to confirm that the
following two ways of calculating residual dose after one year of cooling
give consistent results:

IRRPROFI 31536000. 1.0E7
DCYTIMES 31536000.

is equivalent to

IRRPROFI 31536000. 1.0E7 31536000. 0.0

I have rather the impression that in your example the statistical
uncertainties were not sufficiently small to obtain consistent results.
Could you please verify, maybe with a scoring that allows good statistics

Furthermore, AUXSCORE/What(2)=blank or AUXSCORE/What(2)=ALL-PART gives
identical results.

Received on Tue Aug 16 2011 - 10:19:08 CEST

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Aug 16 2011 - 10:19:08 CEST