Re: energy resolution vs pseudorapidity

Hi Ertan
In fact you are loading the scoring of R2->R20 in the tail of your
distribution...

The root script is a bit confusing. On the X axis of the "hedep" plot
you are loading the what you have in the column/rows of your EVENTBIN
which are corresponding to the energy deposited in your scintillators
(R2->R20) as function of the lattice number, while the title of the axis
say "Energy Deposit [GeV]"

You probably want to plot the Energy deposit vs. the scintillation tiles
number right?

Then you try to place in position 190->200 the actual starting tiles
which of course will have an higher energy deposition...
In addition when entering in a the LATTICE the particle is transported
to the prototype region and there the interactions are made.

If you used scoring "per region per lattice" starting from lattice 0
(which is the real prototype and your case the first 10 layers of your
calorimeter)
you should be able to solve the peak problem.
The first line in the output is the "lattice 0", while the second line
is the second lattice and so on...

EVENTBIN 8.0 ENERGY 32. reg20 9.
10000.evRegLat
EVENTBIN reg2 0.0 -10000. 2. 1. 1.&

For question 2 I don't understand exactly what you mean. If you want to
add the 3rd user defined quantity for special
binning you must define an "fusrbv.f" external routine (Look in chap
13.2.9)
regards
V.

-- 
   Vittorio Boccone
   EN/STI - CERN
   Office  :   bld. 864/2-D01 (Prevessin)
   Address :   CERN, CH-1211 Geneve 23, Switzerland
   E-mail  :   vittorio.boccone_at_cern.ch
   Phone   :   75821   [from outside +41(0)22 767 5821 ]
   GSM     :   16-5737 [from outside +41(0)76 487 5737 ]
   FAX     :   68019   [from outside +41(0)22 766 8019 ]
On 24/11/2011 11:09, Ertan Arikan wrote:
> This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
>
> --Boundary_(ID_1vRFp5uq7Q5Xgrse3fBfjg)
> Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET=US-ASCII
> Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
> Content-disposition: inline
>
> Dear FLUKA experts,
>
> I want to calculate the energy resolution vs pseudorapidity of a calorimeter.
>
> as you can see from the attached input file I used lattice card.
>
> Questions
> 1. In the eventbin (or usrbin) card I used one eventbin (or usrbin) card for prototype and one for lattice and then  energy
> deposition results are in separate lines in the eventbin output. I used a root file, which is also attached, to find the total
> energy resolution but it has a peak end of the tail which I couldn't understand why? Can you give me an advice for reading my
> eventbin (or usrbin) card result?
> 2. How can I use either eventbin (or usrbin) card for pseudorapidity ?
>
>
> Best Regards
>
> Ertan ARIKAN
>